Not to the degree where it could cause a catastrophic rollover.

On second and third look, I retract my statement. You might be right. That looks more like a Mack hood ornament than a Ram.

How could this be a dump truck with the prominent consumer Ram hood ornament on the front?

Couldn’t have anything to do with the 48 inch lift kit he uselessly put on his truck, now, could it?

People think Brodozers are harmless.

The road looks perfectly normal at the point of rollover in my eyes.

Look at the height of the hood versus the Toyota beside him. This dude is obviously driving a heavily lifted “brodozer”, which I’m sure had absolutely nothing to do with a catastrophic rollover when his truck pulls maybe on a good day .40 g on a 300-ft. skidpad prior to loss of stability.

My issue is with those who express withering complaints about present policy, a thing virtually any citizen can do free of charge, without backing up their own viewpoint with a viable alternative. You apparently did not bear witness to Tyler’s petulant whining recently which did NOT accompany his own ideas for an…

<iframe src="//giphy.com/embed/1jnyRP4DorCh2" width="480" height="366" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://giphy.com/gifs/deal-with…">via GIPHY</a></p>

Perhaps I’m exhibiting my elitist city prejudice, but I’d put serious money down this guy is driving a highly lifted Brodozer

It is, however, hilarious to hear you call this a complex and intractable clusterfuck, supporting my argument, not Tyler’s, that this situation requires careful consideration of the pros and cons of any and all policies.

Tyler Rogoway isn’t a journalist. He is a loud-mouthed blogger and apparently an activist to boot.

I wish Raphael Orlove were placed permanently in charge of the Question of the Day. He consistently asks the most intriguing, though-provoking questions without fail.

In other words, you are an intellectual coward just like he is

You don’t even know what you are opposing

You didn’t address a single thing I said, despite my response addressing your challenge directly.

You think that is a defense of Tyler Rogoway’s abdication of his responsibility to present a better alternative attached to his complaints?

He is the problem because he desperately wants to cheer on war but doesn’t have the balls to defend the merits of his ideas. The last time we listened to a bunch of pussy chickenhawks we wasted countless American lives and resources fighting a war in the wrong damn country.

He is too much of a pussy to make any suggestions. I think you missed the point. He thinks he is a big man attacking the policies of others but he runs away like a scared child at the prospect of having to support his own beliefs.