He/she is serious, believe me

It is still socialism by the means conservatives define it, government redistributing the means of production/profit to the general populace.

If scarcity drives civilization, then Africa would be a paradise

Picard is a CYLON

You will find conservatives absolutely love communism or socialism so long as it serves THEM, as opposed to Those People. I think you can fill in the blanks.

We’re still waiting your grand scheme to confront ISIS, Tyler, since you were ever so confident the other day you had the magic bullet to take them out.

You didn’t even give her a Hot Cosby. For shame.

Because being gray is obviously within my control

Still waiting on your promised plans for launching American ground troops to fight ISIS, you fucking pussy

The Fisker deserves criticism for a lot of reasons, but you nitpicked some really trivial things. Ooooo, mob bosses can’t kidnap people because of the trunk release cable in the trunk, like is true of EVERY CAR IN AMERICA. The steering column motor is too strong. The exhaust will go through the driver’s window, even…

Really important this point is hammered home over and over again. American ground troops could indeed be the right strategy but we need to at the very least debate it before we go in half cocked.

“Hi, I’m Tyler Rogoway. I believe the United States should commit at the minimum tens of thousands of American troops to directly fight ISIS but I’m too chicken sh!t to say it in public.”

Tyler’s argument and yours is entirely rhetorical. You don’t seem to realize it yet.

“by doing your enemy’s bidding”

You are a fascist traitor who prefers to serve the goals of terrorists as opposed to serving the United States.

“I will address this in the future”

Yes, it is absolutely clear he believes we should not consider our enemy’s objectives. Until he explicitly says otherwise through a clarification, I stand by my statement proudly.

Even if our policy achieves exactly what they want? That has absolutely no importance to our ability to defeat them?

Anyone who thinks the enemy’s objectives should never factor into our policy is a certifiable idiot.

I’m quoting his own words directly. He is the one who thinks we should never consider the enemy’s objectives, not me.