Everyone I’ve ever spoken to about Fantastic Beasts was amazingly disappointed that Colin Farrell turned into Johnny Depp. No one likes Johnny Depp in the role, especially since we’re supposed to believe Jude Law’s character has a thing for Johnny Depp’s character.

The running back had tattoos on his arm? Is it common for 17 yr olds to have tattoos? 

“Lyft and Uber should’ve been scamming these people from the start! Now it looks suspicious!”

In answer to your “why would he?” question: because they are claiming the drivers are contractors who can take or leave a fare based on whether it’s good for them or not. Hiding this information takes something that was already difficult and makes it impossible.

I remember my in my early 40's a buddy came up and asked if I wanted some blow, I was like “nah, I’m good”

Perfectly put.

I’d honestly rather hear the hardcore porn directors take on things, it would at least be an interesting angle.

Sounds like Mr. Imel just learned that it’s no longer 1959 the hard way. With more and more women being involved in battle as well as more and more jobs that would have once been “men’s jobs” or hobbies that were male dominated, there’s no reason that there shouldn’t be toys that represent this. Hell, one of my best…

Right? I mean if we can’t trust the man who brought us not just “Jeepers Creepers”, but also “Jeepers Creepers 2", then I don’t know what to think!

Grasping onto the threadbare comfort of nostalgia with the twisted fingers of old age?

“for not liking movies like Ant-Man.”

They may just say “It’s not for me”, and not “ it’s despicable", can you see the difference, one is normal response about difference of tastes, and other is "I'm self-affected snob who hates people for liking stuff I don't".

This is the first thing I thought, too. The topic doesn’t sound remotely memoir-worthy. It sounds like this book could have been just an interesting chapter, at most, in a much bigger memoir. Is the whole point to show that Onassis was kind of a cold, manipulative opportunist? Pretty sure we already knew that.

Apparently the team doctor(s) say he can play. He’s gotten a second opinion, which he’s allowed to follow in good faith under the CBA. So this leads to three likely scenarios:

I would absolutely call the play “Goat Hunter”. 

Why do you think this is an individual worker issue rather than a league-wide one?

Pretty much every Jets player is guilty of conduct detrimental to the team every Sunday.

It would be difficult for the Jets to look worse here, but I've said that before and been wrong so many times, so let's see how this plays out...

If only there were a group of people whose job it was to stand up for the players against owners who may not have the player’s best interests at heart. If only such groups were organized into some kind of “players’ association” or something like that. I’ve heard that writers on websites create these things called…

effectively end the race more than five miles early