So attacking a random person on the street isn't asking for trouble? She did that. She attacked first

She's no victim. She's a bully who is only in this cause her victim fought back against her

The do called threats started because she attacked them first. You have the order of events backwards. She is the bully

> I never really saw her stoop to twitter and sling insults.

She's not a victim. she's the aggressor

She's not a victim. she's the aggressor

We got here because people like you weren't silent. You attacked first, then when people for offended by your lies and shaved m slander, you double down and insulted then even more. If you were silent you wouldn't have been targeted by the least dangerous "terrorist" group ever

It didn't though. She attacked first, then attacked those who got offended by her

she didn't respond to slander. She slandered first then attacked those who got offended even more

and she delivered less than half of them, and its been two years.

"2) It produced all the content that it said it would produce"

But im sure you feel anitas word is law?

This is the site that helped cause gamergate by slamming every gamer

femenist frequency hasn't delivered what she promised. Two years later and she's only done half the videos

youre saying that on a site that can't even communicate when they're sleeping with people whose hands they're covering, repeatedly

include gaming journalists and we have a deal

no. Sony's was announced before n64s controller was shown to the public, quit making shit up. That's why I call you a fanboy, you're an aggressive liar. The exact kind that makes me like Nintendo a lot less since I was a kid cause the aggressive liars are always Nintendo fans

still better than depression quest. Cuter too

I agree. Wii u could have kicked x1/ps4s ass at multitasking if they tried

and nothing of value was lost. Its a useless service.