You are absokutely correct

the human eye can see over 200 fps...

that disclaimer is given in bad faith to cover herself. If you'd watch her videos to the end, you'd hear her talk about how the tropes lead to real violence against women. You don't argue things are a threat to you and want them to stay.

we have nothing against better representation in games. In fact, I'm all for it. I buy games with non-sexualized women on the box without researching the game because it tells me the devs are confident enough the game will sell on its own merits instead of needing a pair of mostly exposed breasts to do it for them.…

"I am against the shittiness of the style of argument we've seen so much these last few months... the hounding and haranguing and the disinterest in treating other people like, well, people."

but you proved gamergaters point

So, making it the objective is whats wrong? But gta was banned in places for things that arent objectives in the game.

It's exactly like their handheld

it won't

I thought you wanted this to happen, given how much Anita Sarkeesian does and how much you promote her.

Wont work. If ganergate taught us anything its that violence against men is encouraged

This is what all of her examples are like though. In hitman its worse cause she had to kill hundreds of men herself to do it

Well it is what anita sarkeesian claims and this promotes the hell out of her

A tactic this site has actively promoted against others like chicfila

This is exactly what anita wants though.

You picked a horrible example. In her video the devs didnt pose the women, SHE did. By use of the global physics engine.

I love how dosagreeing = ganergate = ban him. Cause you cant learn from your mistakes that causes this

Um yes it is an example of such.

I don't think they'd employ a man