neotechni01
NeoTechni
neotechni01

So you agree death threats are bad and that no one should associate with the side that makes them?

Not quite.

But your side started the death threats. Why do you get away with it?

So death threats are bad, right? We agree on that. Your side cast the first stone though

And here's the valid evidence the "people" below you have ignored

It could, should and won't. If you knew how bad Zoe Quinn was you'd laugh that they are defending her

Geeks and nerds have never been bullied? you clearly never went to high school

I agree, but in fairness, this article is a pure insult. Him using the term SJW is hardly a problem in comparison. It's hypocritical to even care slightly about him at all when there is this article of pure hatred.

I've seen that one too.

The FBI actually recently redefined rape so that it includes men. So he's wrong on that one. Signed: A rape victim. Wow, that's a pathetic appeal to authority, but there it is.

Yes, there has always been feminist critique. But they didn't outright lie about it like Anita. Or attack the gamers specifically like Breanna Wu and Leigh have. And then there's Zoe:

Actually, Anita made it a point to complain about TWO artist's big breasts. Turns out both artists were female. (Bayonneta, and one fanartist that Anita stole art from)

If you assume it's the same Zoe Quinn who lied to the media and had 2 charities shut down. Assuming you care about what kind of people they are you should care about both sides right?

Actually you're misinformed. There is a LOT more

"Your fucking bullshit "movement" started with harassing and threatening women."

The part where no one applies the same definition to the other side

"#Gamergate's primary methods of disseminating information have been in the form of aggressively doctrinaire images, Youtube videos, and pastebins"

The question is, do games have access to the data, so they can change the perspective or perhaps have the girl in a dating sim make eye contact with you?