Unfortunately that interferes with U.S. reflector laws.
Unfortunately that interferes with U.S. reflector laws.
It would be a One:1:I or a One:1:Ett
That’s the Regera that you’re talking about, the One:1 has a conventional double clutch.
I think the wing acts more like a spoiler. The air that goes under the wing fills in the hole in the air left by the car. That air is already turbulent from touching the car, and will become a large vortex behind the car. Meanwhile, the majority of the air will flow above the wing and thus be shielded from the…
I’m pretty sure the reason that everyone is doing that to their wagons is because of aerodynamics, not because of the styling. If anything, it’s detrimental to the styling of the vehicle.
It’s so sporty that it even smiles instead of frowning angrily.
I think only a very small amount of CVT’s were ever sold (in the U.S., at least).
You could say that in this case, styling would be a 4.5.
This car is the Juke RS Nismo, not the Juke R 2.0 that has the GT-R underpinnings. They really need to change their names to make it less confusing.
I think they probably are, but uprights on F1 cars break at lower speeds, so there is less force. The weight of the wheels may also be a factor. They still probably should be strengthened, however.
I think qualifying was wet but the cars are still quite slow.