nekomurphy
nekomurphy
nekomurphy

Eh, using undeniably popular movies based on work by the same author to promote one of his works that the general public isn’t nearly as aware of is probably not too dumb in my opinion.

I disagree. Stay out of the plains. Stay on the coast away from me.

Probably too soon, but since I was thinking the same thing I certainly have no moral height from which to condemn you.

I thought Io9 stuff still appeared under the Io9 url though.

I concur and I cant stand Trump. Though Gizmodo is a business, and businesses run on revenue. You, like I and many others... clicked this article. We’re contributing to their clicks! These articles are like the empty-calorie-meals for our brain’s consumption

Dear Gizmodo.

I want more female lead characters, like anyone else, but I’m not sure why so many seem to be demanding this male character be remade into a female one. Sure, it’s possible in the fiction, but why is it so important? Why not make a new female character and have her establish herself on her own merits? Would that be

While I respect her choices, man did you nail this situation on the head. Why would someone pay to work, pay to commute?! I took the alternative approach and got very selective this go around for employment, made sure I was a very close commute and that I liked my job a lot before I settled. Not everyone has that

This, this right here. Unless the business connections you are gaining from working in said office appear to be valuable contacts or generate noticeable referrals, this is dumb.

For serious...

No offense, but this seems pretty preposterous. You’re paying $6k each year in after tax dollars just for the office rental.

A lot of people are just done with being inundated with “diversity”. I have no issue with having a black, gay, or female character in a comic book, but when you’re constantly being reminded that you’re reading about black, gay or woman character, it gets old. Just do your thing and let it play out instead of turning

Yes, but Millennials gotta Millennial. ;-)

The best thing they can do is give Capaldi a stoic, quietly emotional regeneration - I will ball my eyes out.

Capaldi did great work the first two seasons, but what he’s doing this season is a whole new level. I’ve caught myself several times thinking “this is a privilege - what we’re seeing might not ever happen again on this show.”

Oh thank the maker. It’s hard to tell these days - a startling amount of people will hate Capaldi on principal alone. He could fire off the greatest delivered monologue of all time and they won’t care.

There are those of us who liked Capaldi right away, and/or were happy to see Smith go, by the end.

“At one point Capaldi said he’d do 5.” And in fairness, it will soon have been five years since his first appearance as the Doctor, eyes-only in the 50th anniversary special. It’s not his fault they spaced it out so much.

The most painful part is, for me at least, that Capaldi started at “There’s no way you can replace him”.