Although, this depends on said politician even giving a concession speech.

Also, it’s wise in a crime filled city like Prague to keep a few templates for mines next to your toilet. You never know.

I approve this message. +1

As an Angels fan, I applaud Dusty Baker’s managerial prowess.

I’ve said it before on another article. George H.W. Bush lost a debate because he casually looked at his watch. That was enough. Now we have Trump talking about a 10-year-old becoming his future arm candy and allegedly shoving his tiny fingers up women’s skirts, and these are suddenly not disqualifying remarks. This…

As an attorney, I am keeping a copy of this letter for inspirational purposes.

Short version: Trump’s speeches are stream-of-no-conscience.

This is the same Curt Schilling who went nuclear on a guy who worked for the Yankees who made comments about his daughter on Twitter, right? Just checking.

Timing is everything, I suppose.

I would love us to adopt election rules similar to those in the U.K. Their campaigns are basically a month long and have a cap on the amount that can be spent (around $33 million in 2008, from what I gather). While that time frame may be too short for our primary system, I think it’s worth exploring if we couldn’t…

More proof that politics have nothing to do with doing what is best for the country.

“Oompa-loompa dobadeedoo, I’ve got another Cosby for you.”

If he were to win, I imagine they too would find themselves in the position of the contractors that Trump usually doesn’t pay after they finish the work. “Thanks for your work, but I don’t think we won by a large enough margin, so you work couldn’t have been that good. That’s why I’m giving you jobs as White House…

So you’re saying the question took the air out of the press conference?

+1 billable hour.

George H.W. Bush lost a debate because he looked at his watch.

Meanwhile, the other candidate isn’t hired because she’s “overqualified.”

Where he scored was with his base and the Clinton enemies who have been waiting for someone to call them liars to their faces in a national forum (however ridiculous many of their claims might be). He was a proxy to get all those grieveances out in the open. Other than giving the temper-tantrum wing of the party…

No, having the fish would be cray-cray.

Totally agree.