negativenina
negativenina
negativenina

OMG, I understand so much. It sucks hardcore. I know you're loneliness and I'm sorry.

Oh, shut up. You don't know her husband, and you have no way of knowing what's going to happen. You just wanted to drop a little puritanical judgment, so I hope you're happy you got that out of your system.

Oh, shut up. You don't know her husband, and you have no way of knowing what's going to happen. You just wanted to drop a little puritanical judgment, so I hope you're happy you got that out of your system.

Oh, shut up. You don't know her husband, and you have no way of knowing what's going to happen. You just wanted to drop a little puritanical judgment, so I hope you're happy you got that out of your system.

To all the people commenting about how resentful you would be, or how its not fair he gets to fuck around while she's pregnant, give it a rest. It works for them, that's all that matters. They're both happy with the arrangement. If it wouldn't work for you, don't do it. But we got it, some of you would not like it.

Oh and if haters gonna hate, keep it to yourself, I don't care what your opinions are about my reproductive choices. Thanks!

My baby mama is my beloved surrogate, and I actually found this really helpful. This doesn't necessarily have to be about gender (or rather, the male vs female trope). I truly don't understand what she's going through and when she's telling me she's getting irritable I'm just like (to myself) "HOW DO I FIX THIS?!" I

You did refer to this specific case, but regardless, yes, obviously patients need to be informed of the likelihoods of false positive and false negatives with any screening tool. I'm sorry that you've experienced a lack of that. Maybe I have exceptional doctors, but I have always had doctors explain to me the

No it doesn't appear to be the case. We have no idea if she was informed of these things. She may be a hyper reactive person who panicked. Don't blame the doctor when you don't have the details of the story. It's absolutely unclear whether or not they were provided with the appropriate information beforehand.

This is a poorly written, scare mongering article. These tests are not faulty; they are simply limited in their specificity and sensitivity. Which is true of many screening procedures for a variety of conditions, both in the realm of obstetrics and out of it.

Christ, this article is so scare mongering. It is the doctors job to explain these tests are not diagnostic, that they have a high false positive rate for certain conditions, and that further testing is always required in the event of a positive. This is a story about a few couples who maybe overreacted or weren't

How?

Their jobs. This is one person's story. And clearly the doctor was concerned about false positives judging by his or her response.

Isn't it though? Well I'm glad I'm not the only one that notices such things. Sometimes I wonder about myself.

I thought losing mine to an alcoholic, (now) felon, multiple misdemeanor, (now) 40 year old that works at Pizza Hut was bad. But yours makes even mine better.

I recently googled the guy I lost mine to: arrested for a felony, threatening to assault his wife with a gun. He's also child support delinquent. I checked him in our state database of court dockets and he has numerous DUIs, as well as court dates related to his child support payments.

Sorry, it jumped out at me!

Did seriously nobody notice the URL? "school district creates sex ass"

My favorite part. She barely looks up from her phone.

Thanks. I've never read Hamlet.