nebraskastig
NebraskaStig
nebraskastig

Yes, I was condoning homicide as a corrective action for someone throwing a slice of cheese on your car. Dumbass.

Ignoring the tossers for a second...

I don’t care for them, but if you have to have them, they are a million times better warm/melted than cold.

From the video, there are plenty of crackers involved.

Hey, what’s a guy gotta do to get shot in the face around here??

Wow, the antivaxxers are out in spades on your thread here. And I hate that, before I expanded the thread, they were the *only* ones showing up. Then I “see all discussions” and suddenly only a few are at the top, the rest are pushed down.

There was a case many years ago where a guy was rejected from the academy for being too smart. He sued the department, and I think the ruling was that smart people are not a protected class, so he lost.

Lol. In this case it’s probably best to not do either. 

I’m confused why you think this costs any additional money for GM to produce. On a different note, why do you have to “pay” for cars that have speed limiters? Why do you have to pay for TPMS when you can just check the tires yourself before driving? Why do you have to pay for all those fancy safety and warning

It’s hard to pretend spray-painting is done in self-defense.

I think one of the requirements is to be that stupid.

Why is it entirely appropriate that a person named "Florida Man" is the one who seems entirely self-centered when it comes to seatbelt use and in the same breath, also self-centered when it comes to the COVID vaccine?

That’s fine, it’ll make it easier for the insurance companies to deny claims.

Sure, and if you get in an accident and kill yourself, good job - that’s gonna weigh on the other driver for the rest of their life, injuring them mentally.

WWDTD

They were actually a compromise. “Passive restraints,” primarily airbags, were required starting with 1990 model-year vehicles. Some vehicles bit the bullet and put in airbags (Ford Taurus, for example). However, those automatic belts were a compromise allowed for awhile since it is expensive to engineer airbags into

Let’s take it 1 step further; if you aren’t wearing a seatbelt and get into a crash, then OnStar shouldn’t be activated and instead it should call your mother to rat you out.

Funny you mention that. Agreed that it’s not the same and being unvaccinated puts others at risk while being unbelted does not, but a while ago I ran the numbers (I can’t find the spreadsheet and am too lazy to redo it) and found that the reduction in your odds of dying in a crash caused by wearing a seatbelt were *ext

Yup, that extra 2 seconds to snap in is a real pain in the ass I tell ya’

Sovereign Immunity.  Like Diplomatic Immunity, only you can’t revoke it like Danny Glover did in Lethal Weapon 2.