As much as I love hatchbacks and prefer smaller cars in general, I am willing to compromise for my longer-legged friends and put my vote towards the advantages of the longer, the elegant, and the versatile station wagon.

Stay tuned for a highly flawed study at 11. You won’t believe the conclusion!

Some cars just deserve to be in wild colors and I’m sure it also helps their resale. Case in point, Chargers and Challengers.

Ummm:

This may sound callous but someone that always wanted a convertible but never bought one really didn’t want a convertible. So the best answer is a convertible that really isn’t. I give you the Volvo T70 hardtop convertible.

Rory was close, but I’d go older with an R107 Mercedes SL. For $25K you should be able to find a well sorted one that will be reliable for at least a year. And prices on these are on the upswing, so you may be able to sell it for profit.

Highly underrated response.

Fuck it.

Source: I used to sell Buicks.

“Doesn’t want: Something too unreliable”

Eh, they put it in the header. It was the non-spoken recommendation. 

A Solara is much more comfortable, likely more reliable, and isn’t absolutely miserable to drive at over 30 MPH.

The estate will have to pay.

Yes. Here’s a 2008 Boxster S tiptronic in Guards Red over tan.72K miles and heated seats. Asking 22995.

They never came in automatic.

Not in production yet, just hoping Elon Musk comes down off what ever he’s taking before it does:

Wow. Wrong. 

I don't think either of these were preceded by concept cars. 

This mistake already haunts me

Might want to reread the question.