Yeah... that just smacks of closing one’s eyes, putting one’s fingers in one’s ears, and shouting “La la la”. That is not ethics, it is trying to maintain plausible deniability.

Buddy, you’re the parent of a teen boy. There’s a LOT of shit you aren’t seeing them do.

Actually landscape mode would have caught more of the event just fine, as is seen when the guy finally turns the camera, even though at that point it now means the video is rotated.

Scientists can’t even definitively prove we evolved because the timeline doesn’t work (because we didn’t evolve, but that’s another debate)

Well they did say that Grindelwald was the ongoing villain over the 5 film series, so I would assume the former actually.

Thought the same. But A: Maybe that was added or made stricter later. B: Perhaps they apperate right before the limit?

Not recent at all, but since people are coming up with other examples, I still remember the Adam Ant episode of The Equalizer that actually DID air once, and then got so many complaints it was pulled from future reruns and syndication.

Not that I debate that Brown is a she, but does “they” not also colloquially work in this post? It may not be exactly correct, but people say “What were they thinking?!” for example about single individuals all the time.

Is it just me or is the Daily Mail totally scummy?

Am I missing something? That cat seems fine, so good. But since it spends time in those photos enclosed and wearing sweaters, how does it not cook? I am assuming it is not really in there for very long, but still....

Really. That just seems horribly deluded. It is a single film. You might get something some attention for a moment, but it will change nothing.

It’s gotten boring and sanctimonious and there is something for everyone to hate in the politics, which has finally killed it for me (and I used to go to a theater and watch it on a big screen like a fun event).

While I agree with you about Modern Family’s general lightweight charm, I would say that for every right wingnut who gets upset about the presence of gay or Latin characters, there is a left wingnut who gets upset about those characters’ portrayals as being offensively stereotypical.

I am not saying he did not want to. I agree, he did. But wanting to and rallying your party are two different things. He had a solid majority in his 1st two years and did not do it then. And after Sandy Hook he probably had his strongest public support for change, much of his own party refused to back him for fear of…

Actually, that is part of the problem as far as I am concerned. He talked a lot, and probably did drive up some panic and buying. But he did not actually cause any change.

I am not sure about the point of this post. In other words: “When people think something is about to go away, they stock up on it. And when they think access is fine, they go back to normal purchasing habits.”

I don’t know about regular drinking wine. But I use wine in cooking all the time, so this might have potential as an alternative for that.

WOW. A lot of details left out of the story posted here. While the officer still is guilty of his actions, the people in the car are absolutely horrifically negligent as well.

Yeah, as a lot of others have chimed in, this is a silly take.

Actually in Target it sucks in a lot of locations because they keep the headphones locked on the hook. When you want one a store associate has to get it off the hook and then walk it to the counter for you to purchase.