Seeing as how you’re contributing nothing, just making random requests (i.e. acting with the decorum of a small child), I’ll reciprocate....

oh god shut up why won’t you shut up

Someone using absolutes incorrectly, and prognosticating false statistics to prove something, is a flawed method. Giving an example of a separate group, who uses the same flawed method, is simply a reference to give further perspective.

This a very simple notion. It has nothing to do with the subject matters (they’re…

Saying there are no cops that want to protect, rather they all want to bullies &  99.99% of all cops are bullies or thugs is a poor methodology. Because no matter how we cut it, those are unproven statements.

We can use the word “most” and still prove our point. But using speculative stats, & unproven declarations,…

That’s fine. I really don’t disagree with that.

My interjection (with the inital individual) was completely based off two statements.
a) ALL cops are cops to be bullies, zero to serve or protect
b) 99.99% of cops are either bullies or thugs
--verbatim--

And all I said was using this type of unsubstantiated rhetoric helps…

All NFL players, who make a dirty play, have immediate retaliation scenarios (for every subsequent down they play).

I’ve gotten stitches a few times on my face; cuts that require stitches in the facial area are like spouts (especially when in conjunction with exerting oneself).

Where’s the story on the “sex-belt”???

I think there’s a systemic problem with police brutality in America, particularly against its black citizens.

In no way do I think we should do anything extraordinary to defend cops, particularly “bad” ones. In fact, I think they’ve been held criminally unaccountable to this point for most of the horrific things…

“The notion that one can never generalize or use contextualized empirical data to make useful observations about a group larger than one individual is absurd”
-Agreed

I wasn’t trying to joke! I was trying to bond...show we have at least one mutual trait. A joke would be, “why don’t you lick me where I fart?”...now that’s an effin joke!!

I’m not going to call you names. I don’t know you. I just know you’re deciding to not actually comprehend my statements.

Show me where (cut and paste the motherf*cker, or whatever it takes) I’m  I’m equating racism in america to prejudice against cops??
Rather than equating a poor methodology....One used by this…

Lmao...

I never said we have to be better people than cops.
I never said we can’t criticize cops, especially on discussion boards.
I never said we need to silence dissent.

Which I mean...since I never said ANY of this, why are you directing this at me?

In fact, before people decided to “project” whatever exterior…

OK.

I’ll explain this again. Obviously somewhere people have to decided to either straight project or interject other debates into my commentary.

No cops are born cops. I’m not saying cops are a protected class. I mean, I REALLY never said that. Literally or figuratively. I never said police officers have a…

Again... this isn’t a false equivalency.

I never compared the situation. I simply stated the methodology being used by this particular commentator is the exact same methodology used by very ignorant people when they discuss minorities.

I never purported them having the same value, in terms of results or outcome…

I do think its funny. I’m just being “snarky”....in that if this was a male teacher, their would be no “joke”. It would be a straight slam piece.

I simply pointed out it’s fair to say many or even most cops may have ill-intentions for being a police officer (or continuing to be police officers). But to say all is erroneous. And that comment was directed toward one single individual.

I had no intentions of derailing anything. And if “trolls” nowadays are…

I’ll break this down a little better for you. You obviously didn’t follow what I was saying (lol, which makes that tone-deaf comment that much funnier!)

So I never compared racism against minorities...to anything actually.
I simply stated the methodology being used by this one single individual, in this debate, was the…

I have to assume from the context of your paragraph when you say “all”, it’s a direct reference to the all the police officers present & accounted for in the shooting of Terrence Crutcher.

Albeit a mature repsonse, I’m pro-dialogue. Ergo if you want to have a grown-up discussion, great! Beyond that, I have to politely decline your request. 

He looked good. But honestly I’d love for someone to name a single Bears DB.