It does, but let’s be honest - if anyone actually owned a restomod like this, they’d never actually use it to haul anything for fear of scratching it.

GM seems to have a history of pretending to be serious about EVs and then not actually being serious about them.

David, I think you may have a problem. I’m all for your obsession with tinkering with cheap 4x4s, but all the ones in this article are absolute heaps.

OK, fair enough, but I still don’t understand why the car needs the ability to go that low at all. Do people think it looks good?

Not everything has to look like a normal car, but not everything that’s different is better.

Careful... don’t make Max mad, or the car might end up looking like this:

Wrong. All stance is bad stance. This Corona is ruined and it looks stupid this way. Too bad, since it would be a sweet little car if it hadn’t suffered this travesty.

Found the pothead.

That doesn’t sound like a glowing endorsement, TBH.

I believe it’s on the Ranger platform, which should answer the question. Independent in the front, solid in the back.

We know it’s on the new Ranger platform, so at least it’ll be a capable truck, and the outline in the teaser images looks like some pretty boxy retro styling. I have high hopes.

Instructions unclear. Threw a Dodge Dart at computer screen. Need a new computer.

Toyota Corolla.

Are those numbers real? Jesus fucking Christ, Americans are stupid (and I say that as an American).

1st: Welp, another addition to my list of Reasons Why General Motors Can Go Fuck A Cactus.

Springy!

As a youth, you are correct.

What’s the point of having specs for a car that only exists in a game? Why even bother saying it’s electric? It could run on anything from coal to unicorn snot and it would make no difference, because it doesn’t fucking exist. (I mean, technically you could argue that all cars in games are electric because the game…