It's still unseemly to have absurd amounts of money and take a scholarship that's supposed to help talented kids who need it.

I manage the thumb + index finger zoom pretty easily. With the phone itself having the three other fingers holding it against my palm.

Seriously. Pill or not, we should still be teaching kids to use condoms.

I'm 27 I don't have classmates anymore.

Even then I'm generally compelled to sugar-coat a bit and talk about "getting a drink at my place" or something rather than outright being like "Hey. Let’s bang."

Oh I absolutely admit that men tend to have inexplicably high standards. I'm guilty of it myself many times. It's party a sense of ego and entitlement, but there is also a bit of "If I'm going to get shot down anyway I might as well get shot down by the hot chick because at least then I can tell myself she was out of…

The fact that it's full of teeth is why it's an expression of trust!

a.) I don't think you have a clear understanding of what MRA people or PUAs are about if you think that's one of their "holy tenets." Even among the grievance mongering MRAs you will find few who, when pushed, will claim there is no woman on Earth who can't get laid. And PUAs are more about asserting that anyone can…

I don't think anyone claims that all women, all the time, everywhere can always get sex. People tend to speak in generalities about things like this and in general, your typical woman can have a much easier time of it compared to your typical man. The long tail of the population to which this doesn't apply doesn't…

I'm noticing a trend here. Average guys complain that it's hard to get laid because their odds of success when hitting on girls are so low.

Nobody is that direct. If I, as a man, was talking to a woman for 20 minutes and said "Hey, I find you really sexy. Want to go back to my place and hook up?" then 5 times out of 10 I'm going to be called a 'creeper' and the 6th time I'm probably getting kicked in the balls. Maybe 2 will say "I'm flattered but no…

It's not really that fictitious, people are just implying an 'all else being equal' assumption in there. If we're doing a type of horserace where we bet on whether a fat, ugly man or a fat, ugly woman at a bar will land a one night stand I'm putting my money on the woman every time. That doesn't mean it's easy for her…

For some reason I read "straw sucking," imagined someone with a bit of straw in their mouths all Huckleberry Finn style, and thought "What a weird thing to test for."

It's probably not the ring so much as the confidence the ring put into you. I generally find myself attracted to women in relationships (even before I know they're in relationships) and I suspect it's because they don't do that subconscious "Would I date him?" sizing up thing that single girls do when they see me. As…

Moreover, it even points out that this 'exploitability hypothesis' only really applies to a certain subset of males who scored low on desire for relationships and low on empathy/compassion in general.

East Asia is not all of Asia. Basmati and jasmine rice aren't supposed to be sticky.

It makes sense though. Aside from being straight they're the hardest things to reliably test for and the easiest to fake. Hell, you could argue that our entire education system is geared towards teaching people how to pretend they're wise.

I've worked with many nurses in my day. I don't think "demure" would characterize a single one of them.

So basically our modifiers, in order of significance, would be:

That's interesting? What about outlets and contact points for lightbulbs and such?