This is possibly the worst job-seeking advice ever.

While Rajan Zed is generally an attention whore, I can't really blame him for being a bit zealous in his defense of these things. You know how Black comedians can use the N-Word and Jewish comedians can make fun of Jewish culture without being racist? It's because they're closely, intimately aware of what it is…

I suppose you would cite yourself as an example of one of the people who "got a clue?"

Really? I pretty much only buy unscented stuff because I don't like the idea of smelling like 30 different chemicals by the time I leave the house. Soap, shampoo, conditioner, hair. . . Goop (sort of a putty I guess?), deodorant and even laundry detergent. I used to also have unscented shaving cream but switched to…

"I caught my husband using my $60-an-oz Kiehl's wrinkle serum on his ELBOWS. "It makes them soft!" he said."

I think the problem is that they gendered them as "girly" things in the first place. Because bathing and hygiene and basic social graces are for chicks AM I RITE!? Your average man can't be bothered to gird himself for even the most basic attempts at being a functioning adult.

Any man in his twenties will see that word and think this: [images.wikia.com]

Was it hard? You know, being born without a soul?

"I think you know perfectly well what I'm talking about and pretending like you're somehow serving philosophy or truth or whatever by cornering people on the internet and questioning everything they've said, simply because they had the audacity to claim that they enjoy being kind to people is completely ridiculous and…

I'm going to go ahead and ignore your patronizing implication that actually sounding like you've studying philosophy before discussing it is, somehow, beneath you.

That just kicks the can further down the road. Why is reducing someone's suffering 'good?' Is 'suffering' a bad in and of itself? What about bouts of suffering that build character? Would we be better off as a society if nobody ever suffered for any reason?

"I do it because it's good, right, and I believe that good deeds make the world better for all of us."

Their causal relationship is probably backwards. They're treating religious beliefs like it's exogenous rather than something people choose. It's more likely that people gravitate towards beliefs in hell and punishment for wrongdoing if they are culturally predisposed towards taking a hard-line against wrong-doing.

Dude, you can't "find a causation." That's epistemologically impossible. All you ever find is a correlation and you try to find an explanation for the causal relationship. This is how all research has worked since the beginning of ever.

It's really just FPS and RTS where there is a pronounced difference between keyboard + mouse and a controller. For most other types, especially third person adventure games, a dual-analog is just a good. With side-scrollers and fighting games a controller is actually better.

I think it's probably more likely that FTL travel is impossible so we never will see interstellar species.

It can be hard, but it's certainly a lot easier than for most people who have to commute an hour in traffic to get to work and need to drive everywhere they go to run basic errands. The vehicle miles travelled really cut into the daily amount of calories burned.

"Yeah because just a single thing can make you fat in life"

Okay Mr. Clements, I get the picture. But when you're going to blow up the world for people it helps to put something there in its place. A meandering treatise about how all our beliefs are wrong isn't really all that helpful unless you detail what's wrong about them in terms more specific than "Your stances are bad…

It all stems from the same problem though. Video games are too often written to indulge adolescent caucasian male power fantasies. Ergo all the men are caucasian, hyperviolent, roided up killing machines and all the women are sexed up damsels or nymphettes who are obsessed with you.