The truth value of Tony Danza's claims is directly proportional to the number of times he repeats his unsubstantiated assertions.

Translation: you want them to bust their humps and give you the produce for dirt cheap.

"He made his fucking decision based on one cycle"

"Everything that happens happens along a plan, along a cycle perpetuated by (presumably) the Catalyst. And yet you're fucking denying it, you're denying the most basic fact of the ME franchise."

They're not the result of the Reapers. I don't get how you even came to that conclusion. And the rest of your post doesn't actually have anything resembling an argument to refute so I guess we could have just agreed to disagree but what's his face up there is right. You really can't argue without resorting to insults…

Hi Rob, thanks for taking the time to comment.

Says who? It's being explained to you by the avatar of the thing you've been fighting against for 3 games. You'd have to be a completely credulous numbskull to take whatever they say at face value. They're not even lying. They're just telling you their beliefs from their perspective.

"That's a big presumption. I'd suggest you relisten to Sovereign's dialogue from ME1."

"Every one of those cases are irrelevant because the Catalyst set them up!"

I remember in olden days being all "Get off my lawn!" about the kids and their ChinPokeMonsters. Now it's your turn little one.

"The fact that the Catalysts entire argument is "Synthetics fight organics" and yet mere hours before that happens both EDI and the Geth disprove the argument that Synthetics can't live together with Organics."

I can confirm that this is basically how the farmers do things in rural India except they'll often sleep for 2 or 3 hours in the afternoon and then another 6 hours at night. They tend to wake up before the dawn and get a lot of stuff done before it gets too hot, go back home to nap, and then when it starts to cool…

Depends on how old the kid is. The previous games were more 'pew pew' violent but it explores some dark themes involving death, sexuality, and some really questionable morality (not graphic, but disturbing on some levels.)

ME2 was linear, ME1 had wide open expanses.

It's not really a financial issue for me, but I'm also in a better financial position than a lot of guys out there and it doesn't seem quite right for decent men to get the shaft on the dating scene because the job market sucks right now. Saying it's acceptable and expected for women to pay on dates is all well and…

Let me preface this by saying, sometimes people are going to be a bit rude and it'll be unavoidable under certain circumstances and it's totally fine. Everyone is guilty of the occasional breach in ettiquette, myself included, and there's nothing wrong with that. But it's still something we should avoid doing when…

That's because most 'men' centered magazines are actually 'hormonal boy' centered magazines.

I don't get it. Wouldn't a Maxim minus the fratty-boy crap just be. . .an interesting and thought provoking magazine minus the motherhood and women's column? I mean that's basically what GQ and Esquire try to brand themselves as right? What's the new trail they're blazing here?

"were rude for not paying for half of dinner since we had no plans to go on a second date (what?) etc."

As a guy I do find it quite rude, but I also understand that there are a lot of men who send e-mails like the in response to "no thanks" e-mails so I feel like I can hardly hold it against anyone. My general response is usually along the lines of "Best of luck in the future," though. I have a hard time being…