As seen with his Indiana Hoosier avatar. I think it's Tom Crean.

Tippy ta on the tippy tay. And I also like eggs.

Ok so why get on Dez Bryant's shit when he, at least based on the first clip, wasn't even calling anyone out?

This.

No, we're saying the same thing. Like the fact that I just found this out is a testament to the fact that "certain" people, like Manning, Brady, Marino, etc can do it.

Holding someone accountable and screaming and yelling at someone to embarrass them is completely different. I'm not saying that's what Romo did here but other QBs have done it. It's called being an adult when you can hold someone accountable without yelling at their shit.

No Idris? I understand no Michael B. Jordan because he's a bit new but no Idris???

Manning is one of the worst at chewing people out. He does it all the time, esp. when he was with the Colts. The fact that I just learned about that though...

I understand that but forget that. No one is going to yell at me if I'm doing my job or at least trying my best. If someone is fucking up on a project I'm leading, I'm not going nutz on them. There is a way to address people. Shit from the first clip (I know everyone is talking about the Second one) he wasn't even…

Just because you are a quarterback it doesn't mean you have free reign to yell at everybody. That's some bullshit

You know the end of the game rant is not the only rant people were talking about. It was the first one too

I'm seriously sitting here like wtf lol

Why is this not a top comment?

Again, how did that impact the dynamic of white women and black women? Again, black women also couldn't vote as they were not just black they were women too. Again, white women and black women were pitted against one another within the whole institution of slavery. Again, the author was pointing to how that conflict…

Team Wallace because yum

First off I reread twice your assertion about the crux of her argument in terms of the current existence of black/white woman relations in the feminist movement. Did you not read her article. Her main point was that the whole institution of slavery, not just black women getting raped by white men, pitted white women…

Thank you for clarifying. I was getting really frustrated at those who were focusing on grammar as a way to subconsciously (or consciously) derail from the point. It tends to happen a lot on the articles that people of color write. That or you get a lot of comments from people that say "I don't know what you're…

But why? Often times slavery is discussed without black women. And I understand intersectionality pretty well being a black woman. There were many sub-issues within slavery. Slavery wasn't this monolithic experience for everyone involved.

But this particular piece was about black women and white women. The only reason why white men were mentioned because they were doing the oppressing of everyone.

From your point, I can honestly say that you bring a decent perspective into this whole grammar issue. In reacting based on others who are detracting the author and the actual content of the piece by focusing on the grammar. But honestly you bring in a point (leaving people of color hanging out to dry, reminds me of…