The one automaker which (to my knowledge) has never had a safety-related recall.

Pretty much every Ford product of the 1970s, especially the intermediates (Torino, Montego) on down.  Not only did they rust, but the rust rusted.

Pretty much every Ford product of the 1970s, especially the intermediates (Torino, Montego) on down.  Not only did they rust, but the rust rusted.

This is one of my favorite Ferraris, but I couldn’t justify spending this much on it. Maybe if it were a manual in a different color...

I believe that’s right. Pontiac had a factory effort in the 1970 Trans Am series, with TG Racing building the car, the then-new Pontiac Firebird Trans Am and popular driver-magazine writer Jerry Titus driving. Titus only managed one finish in the 1970 season (a seventh at Laguna Seca) before, at Road America, in a…

I was ready to vote NP until I heard the dreaded N-word: Northstar. Thank you anyway; no matter what maintenance is done, though I’ve never driven one, everything I’ve read about that engine makes it seem like a time bomb waiting for the worst time to explode.

I’m sure that someone will want that bike at that price, but that someone probably didn’t drive it in 2020s SUV-clogged traffic.  No thank you.

I don’t know what scares me more: the thought of algorithms deciding for the truck whether to hit my car or the one in the other lane, or how many $50-60,000/year long-haul truck drivers are about to be thrown out of work. We don’t need technology that destroys jobs, we need technology to create jobs.

This reminds me of when someone from Washington State applied for, and had approved, a license plate that apparently asked if the reader got a Manual Inline Lift Fluctuator.  The state gave him his plate, then took it back when those bystanders informed them what MILF really stood for.

Someone needs to get the EPA, the NHTSA and the IIHS on this. I don’t know what further proof anyone needs that the Chrysler 300 (I think that’s what this car is/was) is an extremely dangerous car to drive with one’s eyes closed.

Someone needs to get the EPA, the NHTSA and the IIHS on this. I don’t know what further proof anyone needs that the Chrysler 300 (I think that’s what this car is/was) is an extremely dangerous car to drive with one’s eyes closed.

I think I see why, as I see a parallel with the Ford Mustang Mach-E: GM wanted the Saab image, just as Ford wants to maintain that of the Mustang. But neither wants it in a limited-market platform on unique tooling. GM would rather not spend the money on a unique platform, so they tried to sell the Saab faithful on a…

The supporters are right—it’ll be difficult, if not impossible, to find another this nice--so it isn’t CP.  But it is ND at this price.

The link to the ad is actually that for yesterday’s Mercury Marquis—which is now listed as “pending.” Here is the listing for this Mazda Miata: https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1113977186570367/?ref=search&referral_code=null&referral_story_type=post&tracking=browse_serp%3A98a1a1a0-e60d-4978-9ca5-fb77f1317c21

My personal criterion for buying something like this (a car I would never want as is) would be either a.) the purchase price, plus what it would cost to return to stock, minus for what I could sell the unused removable mods (such as the tires and wheels), or b.) the purchase price less for what I could sell its parts.…

I’m tempted to rephrase that as “two birdbrains with one stone.”

Tesla doesn’t want to sell you the cells for $500 or the new battery for $20,000; they want to sell you a new Model S “from $66,490 after est. gas savings.”

A/C, PW, PL and cruise, but only an AM radio? And no whitewalls? Still, any decent, running car is worth $5,000. NP from me.  Let’s hope the new owner figures out that the horn is on the turn signal stalk.

I wish I had been taught how to drive a car.

How is this current?  This is a 30-year-old car!