so had to see this instead.

Even recently, it’s been pretty dark. The question that matters is “Does it makes sense for the character?” And I think for Dr. Strange, the answer is yes.

The project would leverage Fox’s ownership of the movie rights to the mutant characters, so there would not be any characters still owned by Marvel and Disney appearing.

Nah I’d just grow bangs, they’d never notice.

Every other feature could be found anywhere on the list, depending on the woman they asked.

WHERE’S MY MONEY, HONEY?!?!?!?! Sweet Christmas, that’s delightful.

Yeah, I don’t know if I’m comfortable generalizing “Women don’t care where exactly a man’s pee hole is placed” to “women don’t care about the details of a man’s penis”.

I’d watch that mash up.

Luke Cage?

Ask me how I knew, I dare ya. (Hint, it’s not that Jessica Jones was talking at all, but I could have used that too)

Oh boy that was written by Bendis, wasn’t it?

It could be a bad ass moment, but it doesn’t sound like it’s supported by the character development to be sufficiently interesting.

You mean when someone is taken by the monolith what they become affects everyone?

This thread is now a Best Doom thread.

Dammit stupid embedded link.

This has to be a close second, though.

And he’s also wrong on the Superhero films get low scores. They get low scores when there’s no substance.

I disagree. You needed that time to let the characters find their place and to resolve enough of TAHITI so that it doesn’t get too muddled later on.