There are usually two types of situations where “upskirt” pictures happen and police get involved. The first is these “plain view” type photos. A story was posted here of a man who was taking photos on the stairs of a monument where, because of the angle on the stairs and people sitting on them, he had clear,…

If by “defending upskirts” you mean counter people’s misconceptions about the law and provide examples of it happening to both men and women, then sure. But I don’t think a reasonable person would call that “defending upskirts”. But look at where I’m posting! I should have known better.

But most “traditional” upskirt photos are taken from this type of angle, not drunk women in limos.

Unless you are doing this* to a woman you shouldn’t be seeing up her skirt.

Not anymore gross than having an inappropriate boner plainly visible. You’re out in public. People see it. If people in public can see it, it can be photographed. Seems fair to me.

How often do magazines publish pictures of Jon Hamm’s massive bulge? Remember Idris Elba? They do it here, too. Basically, when a pap happens to catch something like that, they publish it.

You know up-shorting is a thing too, right? And it’s legal, if everything’s in plain view.

infringed on some nice man’s

Are they plainly visible? Then you can take a photo.

How is it not illegal already? Because, in general, people in public don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Or, in other words, if I’m in public I have the right to point and click a camera most places. Codifying limitations on upskirting but not any other allowed photography is, in legalese, really fucking…

I understand being willing to vote for Clinton before any Republican candidate. But if you’re so hype for Hillary that you buy a shirt like this then you’re full on crazy.

What I love best about this “Casting news” is that it’s really just a moderately successful TV actor repeating a long-standing rumor without realizing it is, in fact, a rumor. Then it’s reported as if it’s fact. The Ouroboros of entertainment news.

You identified as an immigrant, why did you mention it? Because it matters to you. And it mattered to him. And that’s ok.

Maybe that’s how he self-identifies.

No, thank you.

A “tirade”, huh? Most tirades don’t so much laughter from the audience.

Her latest song is an airy heartbeat of a groove that totally has me swaying and wanting to meander through the forest on a nature adventure.

He takes it out in front of friends and fellow artists. You’re probably taking it out the mall food court. Big difference!

I’m not assuming that’s her plan dipshit, that’s why I asked.

Possibly. But is the writer of the article doubting her skill as an artist? I didn’t get that feeling either. And it’d definitely be weird for her to manage herself, no doubt. That’s mostly where my confusion comes from.