I shall! And I'll have another.
Sure, that's true. If by "worst" you mean "OMFG that was awesome!" XD
Hey, Dr. Lizardo - isn't Kinja teh awesome, being so difficult to use that no one bothers to check to see if anyone else told you that this was a movie reference? ;)
I think that Lauren was referring to the phylum Mollusca, a class of which is Cephalopoda.
Indeed, Sherlock Holmes with mice is one of my favorite Disney movies ever. ;)
I don't know if that's accurate. There are biological differences between male and female brains - that's beyond dispute. However, the extent to which those differences dictate general or "gender-typical" behavior is something that is still being researched.
I think the people who train to participate are the only ones who get to define it.
I do care. But I'm not missing out. Don't have a peen.
Well, Mars is the RED planet, after all.
Rather than focusing all their time and attention trying to find benefits to male circumcision to justify this outdated religious/cultural practice, perhaps those resources could be better spent raising awareness of the importance of hygiene and knowledge of STIs.
So what this title really should have been was "17 Million Slave Leias and One or Two Other Costumes."
No, I don't think that's accurate. I'm not intolerant of your religious beliefs. It doesn't matter to me if you're Catholic or not. I'm intolerant of people who make the mistake of thinking that their religious belief is a valid argument in the context of a scientific discussion, and I think (based on your original…
And it's annoying to be told that I'm sub-human or that I'm going to hell by religious folk. It's worse than annoying when they try to put that crap into law. But yeah, being a science-related blog, the people that are interested in the science articles are not going to be tolerant of people trying to make arguments…
Then what exactly did you mean when you said you were waiting to get shot down by atheists? I don't care what you believe. I do care when beliefs are dressed up and called "science", or when they're codified into public law to enforce religious standards.
To me, it depends on the beliefs and how eager they are to force them on other people, or into government. You can believe that you were personally shaped from clay by a pin-stripe suited orangutan - I don't care. But the minute you try to present that as a valid scientific theory and get it into public school…
Believe whatever you want. Just don't expect me to believe it, or to force religious standards on me, either.
Really? Most creationists only disagree with interspecies evolution? Is that why they believe that the Earth is only 6,000 years old?