“I know white people assume that the known universe revolves around their un-shampooed scalps as if their heads are preternaturally adorned with a Caucasian halo but trust me”

There is video of Rittenhouse running from Rosenbaum. There is also an eye witness that has said Rittenhouse became cornered and that Rosenbaum reached for the gun.

Can you please provide me the Wisconsin statute that removes a person's right to self defense because of the legal status of a rifle. I can't find it.

Simply saying that doesn't make the evidence magically appear. We aren't at Hogwarts.

Or just to correct the obvious and blantant lies that have been forced into people's brains. 

Rioting is not protest. And the Jacob Blake case was a justified shooting—even Biden’s DoJ says so— and had nothing to do with equality. It had everything to do with the Democratic Party using Black Men to win an election.

Of course, those people would still be alive if they had stayed home and not been out rioting over a justified shooting. Just saying that logic cuts both ways.

All that would have meant is that Rosenbaum would have victimized Rittenhouse. 

What evidence do you have that I am suffering from the Dunning-Krueger Effect? From my perspective the person suffering from the cognitive bias that they are smarter and more capable than they actually are is the person that makes unsupported claims and then expects someone to agree with them even when that person…

I won’t ever know because the fact is that I didn’t. No matter of wishful thinking on your part will change that and I refuse to concede to someone’s wishful thinking.

Nope. I only have one account.

Making actual arguments using facts and relevant law is now spam?

It is too bad that there no MLK’s in this generation.

If the deceased and injured person’s previous actions are not relevant then neither is some of the things that the prosecution tried to enter into the trial. You can’t have it both ways.

Evidence that anyone commenting today is a Nazi?

Do you have any evidence to support your assertion. Also, look at 939.48(2)(b) and consider how that affects the case.

Please provide the Wisconsin law that states that one loses the right to self-defense because he was in possession of or brandishing a firearm. Furthermore, for someone admonishing people for ignoring things you are doing an awful lot of ignoring of facts yourself. Primarily, what the law actually says.

“yes, the first murder of a guy with a plastic bag”

“The best hope for a conviction is in the first killing where Rittenhouse shot someone who was chasing him from a distance and threw a plastic bag at him.”

How exactly did I own myself? Is citing the relevant laws owning oneself?