What, no "badass"...?

Well, I give you a point for playing fair. But that's it - one point. And only for playing fair, in this one very specific instance.

"I'm a boring person."

Hrm. My previous post was affected by a pasting error I didn't notice. You should have waited until it was too late for me to correct it.

You have officially bored me.

No matter how much you twist it, it is not equal to "giving one's word".

That something isn't as dangerous as something else does not mean in any way that that thing is not as dangerous as it is.

Stating lack of interest and saying "Have a nice day" =/= giving ones word that one is walking away.

You, in regards to children drinking alcohol: "Not that dangerous"

Also - yes, reality is messy and complicated. This does not excuse knowingly sleeping with someone's spouse behind their back just for your own gratification. All of your yammering on about this equates excusing the action. You find it excusable because reality is messy and complicated. I disagree.

lol. I never "gave my word" I was walking away. At all. Whatsoever.

They are two entirely different things. I am commenting about not saying anything to someone engaging in either of two entirely different things that are both unacceptable. That they are both unacceptable is the point I am making about saying / not saying anything about either. I am not saying that the acts themselves…

Am I not allowed to do things that are uninteresting to me? And you realize that by saying "I am glad you are not replying further" in response, you are admitting that you repeatedly contradict yourself, right?

Look, I don't know why you keep coming at me with arguments about people cheating on their spouses being none of someone else's business, because I never spoke to that issue.

That more children were injured by car accidents does not make serving them alcohol "Not that dangerous". That argument assumes that children drink alcohol as frequently as - and to a comparable extent to which - they ride in cars. I do not think that is the case. Moreover, car accidents have nothing to do with how…

How people are incapable of understanding this is absolutely mind-boggling.

Did I say that people did not have a right to not say something? No, I did not.

Again, from your own link (that you provided in an attempt to prove that serving a full-sized alcoholic beverage meant for an adult to a 2-year old child is "Not that dangerous"); "Sarah Wollaston, chair of the Commons health select committee, warned: "It is a grave risk to young people's health."

The incomprehensible nature of your first sentence aside, people killed by tsunamis, etc., are killed by the action of the water (and the objects carried in it) upon them. Water has no will of its own to commit a dangerous act upon anyone. The water didn't decide to form a tsunami and kill people. It is the effect of…