HA! Of course it was. He and Ringo have just enough talent to be told what to do by Paul or John.
HA! Of course it was. He and Ringo have just enough talent to be told what to do by Paul or John.
Part of me wishes I was in homeroom right now, because that would mean I'd be a ripe 25 when your dumb ass is looking down the barrel of 50. Unfortunately I work at a tech company and I get paid 6 fig to fuck around and piss people like you off all day. Just call me a professional troll. Do some more mediocre writing…
Oh I guess it's good they keep spending billions on new carriers and battle ships then... ones that never get out of drydock because of malfunctions.
This is wrong...both a misuse of the UI design as Apple laid it out, and a bad design decision in general. There's a reason only the sidebars are transparent, never the app bodies...and the stuff to the left here is as transparent as any of Apples programs ever get (I'm running Yosemite right now). To have the body…
oh no i wasn't defending him. just sounds odd.
ah, and they say privileged kids grow up just fine.
i'm still torn on this. flat design makes sense for mobile because the interaction times are shorter. you have to get your point across faster. It's two completely separate environments that they're trying to bridge with branding consistency that only makes sense on one or the other.
SO OFF TOPIC but:
yeah cuz glass and our weird floating barges are huge fucking successes - Larry Page
"hey guys, lets abandon the SkyBox deal....yeah, no i got some new information from gizmodo's comment board. apparently we don't have it right..." - Larry Page
jokes on them. there's a company in NE that does sat imaging for the fucking military. Aim higher Google. You'll get it right one day.
So...you workout in jeans or a suit?
Idaho? Sounds more like YOU DA HO to me
Who is the asshole counter-balancing me dragging the average down? I need to kill him.
Nope. The purpose of fashion (according to fashion idiots) is to express themselves in a creative manner. Sometimes that can be expensive (Thom Browne suits, Etro ties, etc) sometimes it can be thrift-store chic.
No, it doesn't. The purpose of fashion is to signify that the wearer possesses the financial wherewithal and leisure-time to stay ahead of constantly shifting trends. That is the entire reason we have fashion: To draw a distinction between the wealthy and the busy.
This is called "Fashion". Fashion exists outside the dualistic formality/comfort paradigm you've laid out above. It IS, sui generis, simply for the sake of being. The no-socks-with-dress-shoes look also shown in those photos follows the same line. And it's stupid.
i hate you so much it's impossible to describe it
this ones already a shit hole now too
I misread the title and thought it said "Iron Man Exosuit Will Look Like 2000 Year Old Computer" and got reaaaaaaally confused.