WHY IS THE FRONT END SO UGLY!?

mostly dads and retirees bought C4 Corvettes when they were new

We’ve all seen the infamous starving polar bear picture,

Have you fucking people ever heard of “the white pages”? Holy fuck the utter paranoia of some people is astounding.

wrong place wrong time

How do I join this club of yours, and how much are the fees?

Attractive car? Yes. Original design? Fuck no. Other than the grill and maybe the tail lights, the whole design is utterly derivative.

For fuck’s sake people ... “climate change” is not the same as “global warming” and neither are the same as “human-caused climate change” ... there’s this thing we have ... language ... words ... where we can identify, imply, infer, and express different ideas by the use of different words.

There’s no such thing as a “legitimate” emotional support animal ... they are nothing more than a pet used in place of a childhood teddy bear / favorite blanky.

Thank you David for this quick and efficient write up! I’ve been annoyed for years upon years by people who demand that those words have special and uninterchangeable meanings in the here-n-now. In this modern era, they are definitely synonyms.

This whole psychosis about “exceptional service” needs to be killed with fire. And that means getting rid of the people who create and enforce these kinds of rating systems / policies within customer service organizations. Those people are utterly and irredeemably evil.

a big-ass rat four times the size of even the heftiest of the familiar, city-slicker variety.

turns out they’re monitoring

Okay, make it an Expedition then ;-)

If a Chinook is a Suburban, what is a Super Stallion?

“why China can do this and not California.”

Drone fanboi? Or just a troll? For fucks sake ...

There is no rational basis for speeding tickets (including automated ones) other than local revenue and the corrupt insurance industry

Even before reading this article I was entirely skeptical of the way DNA is used in legal proceedings. This article just reinforced what I already knew: it’s not the DNA itself that’s untrustworthy, but the way it is tested and results interpreted that is sketchy as all get out.

Is that a typo, or is that woman actually named “Michael” in the show? “Michael” as in the common name pronounced “my-kul”? Not “mi-shell” which would normally be spelled “Michelle”?