muleheadjoe
DinoTheDinosaur
muleheadjoe

It may also only be used for certain lines of communication.

Very interesting concept, and I’m sure very useful and productive in the right circumstances. That being said, I am comfortable saying this methodology would not work in most business / corporate / social communications.

Reigns? That’s okay, you probably meant to say “rains” ;)

I’ll grant there are a few — very few — instances of very old people who grew up before seatbelts were commonplace and still drive / ride in old cars without any of the grossly obvious seat belt accoutrements out in plain sight, who then having no habit of using a seatbelt will not immediately think of seatbelts when

do not understand how people forget to wear a seatbelt

The odds that this person intentionally modified <snip> instead of just using one of the many different mods available

It’s not a matter of something being “inferior”, it’s a matter of how well these cars’ feature sets satisfy the desires of the buyer.

Wow, so much hate. C’mon guys, put on your rose tinted glasses ... you have to look at this from the viewpoint of 1989, not 2016. That is retro-futurism down pat, and the whole design is a nice homage to the original 1960's look. Exposed screwheads and all.

Oh I thought that was between the IRS and the person doing the evading. When did Google take that over?

The Japanese definitely know how to get shit done. When I was in Okinawa, I witnessed what (at that time) appeared to be a miracle ... they repaved an entire major thoroughfare in a city overnight. It was done using an approximately quarter-mile-long train of men and machines ... up front were sweepers and manual

Snidely? Methinks you have a low threshold for “snide”. No, what I am saying is that your response appeared to be criticizing people unreasonably for their anecdotes. When someone says “I drove Car X and there was no Problem Y” they are exactly and only expressing a personal experience. Not an opinion, an experience.

I first noticed the term “alt right” right after the election ... I may have read it once or twice before then on G.M. sites, but never once saw or heard it on any mainstream media channel/site. But since the election there has been a MASSIVE uptick in the use of that term across all media sources, and I still

People who claim there is no wind or road noise need to do a bit more research.

The most obvious problem (and I believe this is the gist of WhySoCicero’s snarktastic comment) is that those RWNJs who buy into conspiracy theories and other bullshit do NOT consider or believe that shit to be fake. Hence they WILL be screaming bloody murder about the Conspiratorial Left Wing Radicals labeling their

Do you want to live if in the unfortunate circumstance of a collision that can kill you? Do you want to live?

Niedermeyer lost all credibility in that second excerpt:

While I approve of fuel economy and emissions regulations in general, I absolutely do NOT care for the last 15 years worth of nanny state electronics and heavy bloated construction all in the name of “safety”. I don’t need my car to withstand a fucking nuclear fireball. I don’t need massive side impact beams,

I don’t think CAFE standards would help these folks

I’m of the opinion that the simplest way is to NOT use Facebook or any other social media as a source for news. The people who take social media as news are all fucking morons. Every single one, without exception. If you only see it on social media, it’s NOT REAL NEWS.

This means it would happen in everyday boring sedate driving.