It’s cause they’re hungry.
It’s cause they’re hungry.
I agree with you. It’s not like the engineering team said this, “Hey Jim, don’t forget to program in where a guy is autocrossing, spins out, hits a bunch of pylons, launches the car into the air, and it lands a little bit sideways on its return back to the ground. You already programmed that in, right? Thanks.”
*2018 jd power award for most curtain airbag deployments
Even if it was a joke, what is rule number 1 in car culture?
I mean that’s a REALLY conservative “bro-lift” if it even qualifies at all.
I’m not really seeing any fails here. I just read a writeup on an incident where ATC played the “a bunch of other plans flew through it just fine” card, and a lot of people died when a microburst whipped up.
Pilot saw something that made him uneasy, and didn’t fly through it. ATC kept him from hitting anybody.…
but the company itself is a total basket case.
Kinda funny that Ford is mocking them when they started in a similar way. Constant changes to make cars easier to assemble and a focus on vertical integration. I don’t get all the negativity on Tesla or why anyone would cheer for the most American car company in existence to fail. They are a very young company that…
The cheating crybabies who take those laughable dives have earned all the ridicule that can possibly be heaped upon them, and more.
I doubt even that much thought went into it. Some executive said, “Gimme a Hyundai Santa Fe knock-off with a Lexus grille!”
Clearly you need an old Lada. a) Environmentally friendly (older car, production footprint amortized over a longer time and b) made by the biggest union ever, the Soviet Union
I think the configuring tool is broken. When it calculates the price, it keeps adding in liability coverage for $1,000,000.
Meh, I honestly think each Mazda vehicle leads its class. I can’t think of any better vehicles for class and price.
>turbo v6 jagwag
“Not bad for a 40 year old dad of 5 who sits at a desk all week.”