Maybe their positions will “evolve,” much like Obama and the Clintons on gay marriage?

citation?

Sorry, honey.

When did republicans?

This may come to a shock to you, honey, but politicians of all stripes lie constantly. But in this case, it wouldn’t be a lie, it would just be “evolving” on the issue, if they later changed position.

Fascinating rebuttal. Much citation.

You still don’t get it. Republican’s haven’t failed to do their job yet because Obama hasn’t done his.

And I’m sure the Senate will do their job when Obama finally gets around to naming someone too. You really think you’ll be agreeing “welp, they did their job” when the majority republican Senate gives Obama’s candidate a vote and he loses?

Bork. And what’s the name of Obama’s nominee?

What’s the name of Obama’s nominee again?

Name one Republican who has invoked the constitution as a reason why the president shouldn’t nominate a justice during an election year.

Your memory sucks, dear.

Obama hasn’t even named a nominee, so republicans haven’t not done anything yet. All they’ve done is say that they oppose the sitting president naming a nominee.

And you’re pretending that democrats don’t do the same thing when they can, dear.