Given the 3d cutscenes, it makes the gameplay graphics look that much more dated and jarring. I kind of wish they had bit the bullet and rebuilt the game in a 3d graphics engine, or found a way to replace the 2d enemies with 3d models.

DF2: Jedi Knight really was excellent and is still somewhat playable. Getting a decent remaster would be phenomenal. 

If they get to Dark Forces 2, I’ll be very excited. That was my first FPS back in the day.

So much time in Dark Forces back in the day! A friend of mine and I were super into the early days of modding, creating new sprites and maps for DF while we were in junior high.

I’d feel bad for them if I weren’t overjoyed every time some AI project burns to the ground.

Youtube drama pissing matches are just stupid.

The next single player steam game on the top selling list is Jedi Survivor at #5 which has 1492 ppl playing right now, nowhere near the 6800 number the article claims is so low...  

It’s a remake of the game in the Dark Forces engine.

You mean we’ll enter the “finding out” phase of fucking around?

It’s probably easier than stopping a human actor. Humans don’t respond the same to a whole salmon.

Nah, chief. You were trying to be critical of the game, highlighting what you thought might not be a good sign, and got caught in a bad take observation. Now you’re trying to back up and pull the “It was a joke” card.

Theoretically they could, but they’d get more accurate mocap data to work with for scenes with two individuals.

I mean, the benefit of mocap is having less to hand animate, and having actors record separately would then require those animations to be matched up, and likely changed significantly to avoid clipping etc. Could it be done separately? Sure, but it would defeat the purpose of mocapping it at all, I imagine.

I don’t know about this. I really doubt intimacy coordinators can really stop a bear from doing what it wants if it decides to go off script.

I’m pretty sure that was sarcasm, but you can never be totally sure anymore.

Hi! I’m a lawyer. This fits the legal definition of harm. Thanks for playing.

Its a Bolliger and Mabillard ride, B&M are generally considered to be the blue riband company when it comes to steel roller coasters.

Coupled to the fact that this ride is only 8 years old. I would have to suspect that its less of an engineering/design error. And perhaps more of a construction error. If the support is…

That was my thought as well. If it’s running fine with a support *completely broken* that means they have some pretty decent redundancy built in.

I think they had to do the inside diagonal to maintain the footprint. But it’s also redundantly designed, here. That post is meant to handle horizontal forces and there’s another right next to it.

This event makes me feel safer on Roller Coasters rather than less safe.