Rather ironic for Erin to write an article casting aspersions on someone else for excusing criminal behavior.

Do you ever take a moment to stop and ask why? Should he not be concerned with how his investments would be affected if they were to do this? I’ll admit he’s a bit prideful here, but take a second to think about why someone in his position would say this. And I’m sure he’s donated mor than you and I combined so he…

Lol, these comments are hilarious. They can play you chumps like a fiddle.

Ok, so I watched the Yellow Springs community meeting in question: Dave is just one voice of many on this issue.

Good point, the ironies of the last few years continue:

It goes both ways (no pun intended).

Just point out that “Rules for thee and not for me” seems like such a GQP thing.

Hard to find much punishment for being stuck in traffic. Every one of them has a perfect answer if they’re charged with anything - “I was just stuck in traffic what do you want me to do? I wasn’t part of any protest.”

I suppose they could loot stores and burn them if they wanted to act like animals. Looks to me like they took the effective part of the riots and left the violence out. Seems to be very effective too. 

Hard to believe this family is really top of mind when y'all can't even spell their name right. 

Your inability to see the hypocrisy IS amusing. Thanks for that

You can run over people all you like, just don’t hurt my property. 

I think the difference this time is that what is blocking traffic, is traffic.

So I guess you are the one that decides none of the blue collar workers / trades people making boats, expensive cars, planes should have jobs anymore because you think no one should be able to afford these things? Nice of you. Would love to hear your economic plan. 

My question as well. Why are they (going to) dismantling a bridge for masts, when it doesn’t even have them yet?  Just finish this piece of shit somewhere downstream.

Watch out - this kind of comment gets you all sorts of shit on, in a Bezos thread.*

Wait. Is the yacht currently mastless? Can’t they simply launch and tow it to a dock as-is without dismantling the bridge for the final outfitting?

I mean you can make fun of the guy for having a “toy” like this but you know what? This project has employed hundreds of people in the hard hit marine sector and will continue to employee lots of people for the substantial on-going maintenance that will be required. Captains, engineers, all the other crew, the ports…

Seriously, I’m all for hating on billionaries, but as billionaire yachts go, this is pretty cool.

So they’re repurposing a ship that would otherwise be dismantled in an environmentally friendly manner, and your take is it’s bad, just because it’s for a billionaire?