Would “diplomatic immunity” work against a lit road flare tied to a bottle of kerosene tossed through the car’s window?

Just wondering.

I’ve seen cargo pants, and cargo shorts, but never a cargo *dress* before.

A widespread insurrection of the sort you relate would be unlikely to occur in a world where the aggrieved party or parties has the ability to participate in the election of a new government.

If I’ve got issues and there’s no gun laying around, it’s a LOT harder to do massive damage to myself

Ah yes, let’s ask the Prepper

1. Kill soldiers/paramilitary/police.

This is not a good argument. Besides being ignorant of how insurrections generally work, it also suggests that there is no value in resistance to tyranny in itself, regardless of the success or failure of said resistance. That’s just...dumb.

The problem with this entire line of thought is that it requires one to accept that the Second Amendment is alone in the Bill of Rights in using “The People” as a collective noun (though there could be some argument made for a similar usage in the 10th Amendment).

Can’t make people pay to exercise a constitutional right. Shit, you can’t even make people pay to exercise a *non-constitutional* right (voting).

If you carry for this reason, you are living under a belief that this sort of situation is absolutely going to happen (fear and paranoia), and that you have to be there to be the hero (self confidence problems).

Let’s assume for sake of argument that your fantasy depiction of a modern-day insurrection is correct. Would the futility of resistance to such a tyrannical, murderous regime mean that it shouldn’t be undertaken?

Why? It’s just a rifle, not significantly different from any other semiautomatic rifle.

Ol’ Donny and his fucking “Make America Great Again” hat. I hate, hate, HATE that ignorant right-wing trope. They simultaneously claim:

Fiorina is only slightly less crazy than the others, from what I can tell. Assuming the positions expressed on this page are still accurate, though, she’s still not that far off:

In our current political system, it is close enough to correct as to make no difference - a functional equivalent.

At this point, it certainly appears the country is going to get either:

Perhaps Sanders realizes the truth of the matter: As President, he could *at best* nibble at the edges of the racism which is baked into American Society.

I dunno about this. I’ve had “Life’s Too Good” on repeat at these cookies for the past two days and the damned things are stale as hell.

Indeed. Even women who are otherwise sensitive and decent can have these attitudes.

This is especially hilarious, because I recall reading that Sarah was pretty fond of some pre-marital dick herownself: