No, Bill O'Reilly would've wrote a book called "Killing Underwood" and promoted it on his show.

I don't get how Wolf Blitzer's screws up acting when he is literally just reading news like he normally does. He is such a bad actor that he can't just read fictional news the same way he would read real news.

I think you are just reading it wrong. The actor is not playing a tough guy and failing, he's playing a wannabe tough guy who's really just unhinged and weird. The human side of him is dead and buried (next to what's her face), he's now basically compulsively loyal to Frank.

Watch him be alive in the next episode and nobody draws attention to it.

I liked how they set up before that he's willing to talk with potentially hostile people. (Like at the black church) I was actually engaged to the point of wanting to see him have a discussion with somebody who disagreed, the show got me too, I wasn't expecting anything huge at this moment.

Is it just me or did that bald head from cancer "I'm the MOTHER!" seem like Emmy fishing a bit? I would not be shocked if she got "Best Guest Actress in a Drama Series" nomination and they play that exact clip.

What are the odds they'll have a scene later where that hand print is still there for dramatic effect?

I don't think he had anything substantive, which is why he couldn't persuade even campaign lady. Plus that one guy said no internet and only basic cable (that means Lucas wouldn't even have Netflix!)

2 Things:
1. Hey-o spoilers for other shows :/
2. It's metaphorical if Frank screws him over & throws him under the bus, it's literal if Frank screws him & throws him under the train.

I love it when a show/movie surprises you but in a way that it totally sets up. They lingered a bit extra on Chum-Mee (why did I just realize now this should've been my nickname for him?). But for the most part it was an event I totally didn't see coming but the show was full of clues for it. Goodwin was pretty much…

Yeah, I'm fine with calling the sketch hacky. I'm not super keen on conflating racist with hacky though.

What's your problem? I'm content with the amount of people who agree with me. And I'm very content that I'm not you.

Well next time I encourage you to spare yourself the trouble of watching sketches and passing judgement. I think we'll manage without you.

I don't think the 9/11 comparison is apt or prudent. I think it was dumb that people didn't tackle him, but I'll concede that this comment was back when I thought this show smarter than it was. It's flirting with CSI level realism and it just took me longer to notice the stupidity because Idris and the britishness. So…

I'm confused, you are lecturing me on watching SNL in the SNL review discussion section? What the hell are you doing here? Ostensibly you watch SNL as well, so did you not just equally indict yourself?

Ok then I'll just say that I don't think they'll get rid of him because he's black and they still don't want to seem racist. Plus he is a really good impressionist. He's got more presence than Brooks Wheelan ever did, I'm pretty sure he's safe.

Fair enough. I appreciate your positivity, it is a nice thing to see on the internet, so thank you.

He's a good impressionist and at this point his pretty much has tenure. I doubt they'd ever get rid of him. As far as his side it probably pays ok, and it's stable work. idk

I agree, Herb was great. Hader was great, he elevated even the small parts he played.

Sometimes people get exhausted with people getting offended for no reason.