Well, either Sir Lanka ate him or it was Chavez. Either way, someone was pretty hungry.
Well, either Sir Lanka ate him or it was Chavez. Either way, someone was pretty hungry.
From the study: "In this large prospective study, coffee consumption was inversely associated with total and cause-specific mortality. Whether this was a causal or associational finding cannot be determined from our data."
HEY GUYS
His advice isn't just good, it's usually what Jez advocates: be yourself.
"They should have put a filter on their water coolant system!"
Nowhere does it say that she even came close to unreasonable self-defense or battery. Are you kidding me? It's not like she beat him up; which, fuck, I think she would have been well within her rights to do. She merely physically restrained him. It's not even clear if she made attempts to restrain him before or after…
This is a take on the tortoise and the hare: the question writer on acid and the question writer not on acid. The druggie, while high, thinks he can come up with the most challenging question. The other writer, being quite intelligent, says that they should race to see who can come up with the most challenging…
What sucks is that they're so self absorbed and narcissistic that whenever legitimate criticism is leveled against them for this awful attempt at "music", they'll just say it's because they're "hot."
Jewish American Princess seems more to me to refer to a subcategory of the weathy Jewish population and is less a stereotype about Jews in general. The covetous Jew is a stereotype, but I don't personally see the Jewish American Princess as one.
As long as he's referring to her personality being like a Jewish-American Princess (and not her being Japanese), then I don't see why it's lousy. There are spoiled brats of every ethnicity, he was just citing one type by it's awkwardly-racist-towards-Japanese-people-sounding name. In my opionion, there's nothing…
Jappy = JAP = Jewish American Princess /= Japanese person
I wonder if they can even call burglary (I'm guessing not, since they didn't, they just charged tresspassing) on that since I'm not sure what crime was committed inside the home, intentionally or otherwise. Maybe kidnapping, but she wasn't really trying to harm the baby. Unless they argue that alcohol significantly…
He acknowledges, often, the poor health choices he makes. The main thing that makes his public actions at least partially defensible is that he isn't a hypocrite. Deen, on the other hand, is; that's all he's saying.
Please don't think that everyone in South Carolina thinks like her. Our state has enough trouble as it is.
You'd actually (apparently) be allowed to do that, per part D of the law change that this bill proposes.
It looks like there is a part of the law that says that a doctor can't intentionally omit any information regarding a birth defect. Here's the version of the bill that the senate passed. What I'm referencing is part D.
Ban me. I don't want to comment in a world like this, where Jesus Diaz can walk free and other men and women are to be stoned to death by their fellow readers. This was the worst idea in the history of Gizmodo, apart from hiring Diaz.
Better film than Tron.
Could've been menstrual blood... Even scarier.
I guess some people will go to great lengths to hide their porn, huh?