mredofcourse
MrEdofCourse
mredofcourse

Plants vs. Landmines is an incredibly boring game.

In a related story, former secret service agent Clint Hill, who was with JFK in Dallas, says if he had been one second faster he could have taken the third fatal shot. In an interview he says he has agonized over that "failure" ever since, and wonders every day how different the US and the world would have been if he

My heart just skipped a beat when I read this, you should NEVER blast the insides of your DSLR with that.

Except that dust was never really an issue on film cameras. Instead of a sensor, the camera had a new sensor every time you shot a picture. (aka a new section of film).

Now playing

See this more in depth video. He talks about the point you brought up. He explains NOT to use simple hashing alone.

Could be worse; at least they're not recorders.

So we're just going to ignore the fact that Mark Knopfler is a truly badass guitarist???

Try going "down under". Went on a month journey through New Zealand and Australia. There is no such thing as "free wifi" in hotels. Every place we stayed you had to pay by the hour, 24-hours or if they gave you a token "free 20mb" or "15-minutes for free", you certainly didn't get much accomplished. Once place

Ok...waitaminnut.

Am I the only one who hates video posts. With all the video clips, news, reviews, etc lately I feel like I'm encroaching on a "get off my lawn!" Part of my life... But I just want to read, not watch ;/ I don't want to listen to other people.

Agreed, I tried using LR but after the clunky filesystem I ran back to Aperture. Aperture just seemed more intuitive to me.

Thanks. It appears that you lose all of your edits to your raw photos, as well as any metadata associated with jpg and tiff files. That's an enormously huge downside. I've easily spent hundreds of hours tweaking Raw photos to things exactly how I want them and have metadata descriptions associated with many old,

I have a HUGE fear that without Aperture, Lightroom now has 100% control over the photo org market. Meaning they can shove more of their stupid subscription model down our throats. (Lightroom is 9.99 a month = 120 for a year vs I paid 99 for Aperture that I've been using for 3 years.

Dude, Aperture is a Mac app, not an iOS app. iOS wasn't even mentioned in the article.

I have 19TB of images I now have to find a home for.

Son of a bitch! I was just about to purchase Aperture. I recently purchased my first DSLR and was looking for something a little more robust than iPhoto for handling RAW. I really don't care that everyone says Lightroom is better. I cannot stand Adobe's interfaces and design language (I had a REALLY bad experience

The Aperture is way more powerful than iPhoto. Lightroom is not bad, but the file management is not as good as what Apple did in iPhoto and Aperture.

Yeah, I can see how that wouldn't fit at all.

lol are you basing this on facts? I work in software development and everybody in the field that I know uses apple products. Technologically challenged is actually the last way to describe this group so I'm wondering where your rhetoric comes from?