“My baby, who I am going to entrust to the fickle hand of fate by dumping her into the world of adoption, deserves a chance to have an abusive boyfriend blast her selfishness to everyone he can get to listen, just like I did.”

My life and convenience are paramount!

yessss. This is what I came here to say.

I would love to have seen his feelings if she said that she was going to keep it, but not stay with him.

YUP. He wants his ex-girlfriend to have lifelong bodily changes (and, you know, the risk of death just having the baby) so he can...never see it, not once in its life!

Cha like he would have hung around to help raise said child, I think not.

That was some perfect bullshit. “I don’t want the kid, either, BUT DON’T GET AN ABORTION, YOU SLUT.”

Thank you! Fuck that. I have never wanted children. So I’m not supposed to have sex EVER? How stupid.

Men shouldn’t have sex if they’re not prepared to accept that the woman may get an abortion.

Seriously though can you imagine the collective scream from men if women genuinely took this advice? I would maybe have had sex once every three years, and now that I’m done having kids I guess my husband is done having sex! Forever! If men have a problem with it they can take it to Scott Lloyd. 

Like he’s gonna sit there and tell us that every time he’s had sex, he was 100% making a lifelong commitment. Bull. Shit.

Lloyd argued that women shouldn’t have sex if they’re not prepared to give birth:

I love you David Lammy. My little lamby legs.

The idea that anybody who understands American history would be offended by her closest ally actually practicing the principles in the US constitution...

Plan B From Outer Space

How on earth do these ungrateful young Muslims get radicalized? ask the people who enact these horrors, with a total lack of self-understanding.

That people won’t have to face the same travel costs will be positive but so far we’ve only voted to take the abortion ban out of the constitution in the Republic. It’s looking like it will be early next year before the legislation will be in place (presuming that the Government doesn’t fall before then!) - that’s…

“rape or incest”

Why the (Oh?). The case was rejected because it had been brought by an organisation rather than an individual affected, or potentially affected, by the law. It doesn’t say there aren’t any actual or potential victims.

Punishment and control.