...because a threat of violence against one's person is totally a valid marketing tool.

Got it.

I want to go to there.

"Someday my prince will cum."

I will be taking credit for Prince Eric, whom Kelly and I fought over like his was the last dick on earth. (And by that I mean we disagreed on what his penis looks like.)

It does when the author of the original theory on gluten intolerance is the same person who debunked it later after research studies. Glad you have been paying attention.

"Gluten Friendly"? Do these people speak English? Because that would seem to mean the opposite of what they are trying to suggest.

This has been debunked. You are either celiac or not. Why are we even still even discussing Gluten intolerance?

At least my gluten free bottled water* business plan is safe.

"It's a tough thing," Ryan said, "to believe in a God you don't see."

It's not. One is rational the other isn't.

It sounded interesting right up until the God part. I could not bring myself to play a game about "how can I believe in a loving God when children get cancer and die?". You just answered your own question. As a father of 3, i would like to try a game that deals with the emotions of being a parent and loss, but it…

I'm actually a ton of fun at parties!

"I want people to see Joel," he told me when describing the game. "I want people to mourn with me."

I agree. I'm not religious at all so it's weird of me to see someone doing such a thing. Look at Steve Jobs and his approach to medicine. Nope. Stick to what works.

How's that faith working for you

Easy there, Zombie Zoo. I didn't think my prediction that a distinguished professor and public intellectual will leave a bigger mark on history than a nameless Jezebel commenter would be very controversial. Apologies all around, particularly to the notable feminist philosopher, Hypatia Hilton.

Someone comfortable with nuance.

Well, technically he is correct that under the rules of symbolic logic, the statement "X is worse than Y" (or "Y is worse than X") does not require approval of X or Y. And to be fair, he is an internationally renowned tenured professor at the University of Oxford. But on the other hand, you have access to Daria gifs…

Call me an ass or an over simplifier but I think his point is that he's not endorsing /in favor of/encouraging a bad thing/event and everyone missed the point and started talking about how there are several degrees of badness of said thing, which he doesn't endorse at all.

No, he is explaining basic logic using a terribly bad example.