"You think all for-profit magazines, newspapers, television shows and websites reviewing products are inherently biased enough to never give a negative review when there happens to be advertising for said product prior to it's release"
"You think all for-profit magazines, newspapers, television shows and websites reviewing products are inherently biased enough to never give a negative review when there happens to be advertising for said product prior to it's release"
Let me get this straight. You think a website being PAID to host, for an extended period of time, ads made with the sole purpose of further increasing potential first-day sales for an already massively over-hyped, heavily-marketed game, had ANY intention of writing a review containing anything that would deter someone…
So the ads don't count as a telltale sign because he wasn't referring to them?
Link to image: [i.imgur.com]
Seconded, as long as it's not by Tim "Wall'o'Text" Rogers
I'm calling BS on this. EA is only publishing the game, nothing at all to do with the actual development.
You.
1:11
IMO, an article's quality is directly connected to the author's ability (or lack thereof) to CLEARLY AND EFFECTIVELY convey the most information, using the least amount of words, to the largest audience possible. I don't give a shit how intricate his writing is, nor do I care about the "unusual literary quality to the…
Bookmarked for future reference.
Sweet, looks like Bioware fixed the graphics issue for TOR
Why's it unreasonable to expect a $300m game to release without a stupid amount of problems? Isn't that what beta is for? And surely a good part of that budget should have went into making sure the game was polished out the wazoo?
Cool ad hominem, bro. Attacking the person only shows you don't have a legitimate arguement as to why his viewpoint is wrong.
I think Funcom's learned from their mistakes.