When Ford adopts DEI policies, it’s about making more money. When they abandon DEI policies, it’s about making more money. They don’t care either way, they just want to maximize shareholder value. This should not surprise anyone.

Disappointed in you, Ford. You had the choice between helping people or hurting people, and you choice to hurt. You had the chance to stand up to hate or agree with it, and you agreed with it. You had the chance to take away these bigots power by simply ignoring them, but you chose to give them credibility.

How has it taken this LONG to finally realize this lol. This is 100% proof of why FSD has always been utter bullshit. If it can’t do it in what amounts to a 100% controlled environment, what makes anyone think it can do it on a public road.

Ask me how many times I’ve gone to change the radio volume and gotten the “you can’t shift into reverse right now” warning.

So since Trump recently said we “gotta” restrict the First Amendment, I’m sure Musk has completely abandoned his frothing, rabid support for him, since Musk’s whole (alleged) deal is being a free speech absolutist right?

Of course Trump hates Musk. Musk is the exact same kind of grifter Trump is but he is orders of magnitude better at it then Trump.

Musk: “Trump thinks I’m weird, and has said he’ll ban EV cars that make me most of my disgusting wealth, maybe if I pay him off he’ll let me blow him.”

If DJT told me the time on those two time he was correct I would still verify. 

Porsche dude is right.

This story certainly reinforces automotive stereotypes, doesn’t it?

I’ve never seen a story with so much “yeah that makes sense” to it.  Altima?  Check.  Cybertruck failing a basic function?  Check.

After watching whislin diesel peel off the pillar trim with his hands I dont think its a very good truck.  Not to mention the frame ripping off completely pulling a F150 off a hill.

Of course it was an Altima driver, and of course the Cybertruck failed to meet a claim. I'm more surprised when a Cybertruck performs as advertised than when one fails. 

To be fair, those are period correct, but the period is 2009, not 1979. 

How do you know a given owner did that for their car? How do you know if any other classic owner didn’t? Seems like a weird prejudice to me as someone who did fully restore an early ‘65 Mustang.

I’ll flash my lights at people thinking for sure their high beams are on. Nope.

in car subwoofers? that would be like 80% of all new cars...

Okay grandpa

ANY aftermarket lighting that diminishes the performance of the original unit should be banned. This includes diminished performance due to glare, poor beam pattern (where bulb is not harmonized with the design of the housing and/or lens) or reduced visibility.

Harley riders are on a different level of awful for this.