Sounds like they reinvented the golf cart.

Subaru Baja. No payload. No towing capacity. Could not carry 4' wide material (at least the Maverick can above the wheel arches) It was the Baja:

The Santa Cruz is one of those vehicles I’d answer for a QOTD prompt about a car that you irrationally kind of like. Like, I can’t foresee a circumstance where I’d ever own one, but I also kind of like something about the way they look. I had similar feelings when the Kona debuted. Just funky enough in the right ways.…

Jeep Gladiator -

Alright, look. I’m going to stick up for the Santa Cruz. 98% of the time or more, I don’t need a full-sized bed and the “baby bed” is the right size for chucking some outdoor gear in the back or picking up some bagged mulch from Home Depot. Towing capacity is also perfectly sufficient. If I were in the market, a…

The Chevy SSR:

Lincoln Blackwood. Ford started with a perfectly good pickup truck and made it both infinitely worse and more expensive!

This is the kind of utterly pointless and over-the-top useless feature that should definitely be equipped in other utterly pointless and over-the-top supercars.

For this sort of thing, it is MUCH more efficient than gathering a crowd of people into a building somewhere while they wait for their 5 minutes in front of a judge. They do many dozens of cases a day.

If you’d asked me to pick a car that would make this list before it was published, the Dakota convertible would have been my top choice.

I'm fantasizing that the low miles mean it wasn't driven in the snow/salt that covers Rochester in the 6 months of winter. I'm also delusional in believing Mazda actually had rustproofing in these early days. So take my imaginary internet bucks- NP

This looks like every ‘60s beach movie, so if you live in SoCal along the beach, offer $2500 less and have it shipped to you.

The white really highlights what a pedestrian design this is. Not ugly, just dull. I don’t need a look-at-me car, but I’m thinking the typical Ferrari buyer does. ND.

It was thoughtful for Buick to put ashtrays in the third seat for the kiddies.

You saved it to the end, that glorious, flat, perfectly rectangular load floor. In my mind I was sliding a full sheet of plywood in there without a care. But at my stage of life, I have no conceivable reason to be doing that. Anyway, that rarely needed capability wouldn’t be worth paying $9.5K for a box of ’80s GM…

Assuming I can knock another couple hundred off the price, I’d say NP. Replace or fix the tail light, slap a set of cheap new tires on and put in some sweat equity to clean the car up a bit and drive it all summer. Sell it in August hopefully for near the same price I’ve paid + put into it.

Shame about that transmission, but NP. I had a 2001 C4 Cab with a manual and 120k for 3yr. It was a great car. Reliable, comfortable, great handling and great power. People complain about the interior and the headlights, but the headlights grew on me and I loved how the car looked. The interior was comfy, functional,…

ask that question to yourself, because you seem quite triggered over the whole thing. lol

Sure, bud. It’s the Porsche owners who have fragile egos. Not the vapid man-baby who buys entire companies on a whim (only to burn billions by failing by every conceivable metric) and his bootlicking fans.