No, his race wouldn’t have been mentioned because he wouldn’t have been suspended for staring. Since he wouldn’t get suspended, there would be no story, so nothing about him would be mentioned at all. That’s how white privilege works.

Dude. Maybe not a safe site if you have PTSD. At all. The fact that the website address starts with Jezebel.com is itself a trigger warning.

Well, maybe if he wasn’t black that might have happened. :/

Also, to preempt a comment that is surely coming (albeit maybe not from you), no these socialist countries aren’t perfect, but they are objectively better in many ways that actually count.

Their argument only works when you ignore all of the countries that are just fine and have a strong history of socialist policies and governments. Britian has most of the hallmarks of what Americans consider boogeyman socialism. They are just fine. In fact, fewer mothers and infants die there than here, thanks to…

Tennis court? That’s chump change. Maybe 10 seconds tops. How about a video no less than 69 seconds and in public?

Social Democrat <> Soviet Communism/DPRK/PRC/Boogey Man Socialism that Republicans like to bring up.

*Looks at Nordic countries* doesn’t seem that bad to me.

Nothing goes over your head. You are too fast.

Not really. The names xkvd suggest are based on math.

There is a very fine line here and it is really a technicality. A business DOES have the right not to sponsor a message, but DOES NOT have the right to deny their services based on race/gender/etc.

Only one upped by Jesus Christman, but he is Mexican and she prolly doesn’t like “their kind”.

The problem there being that the “beliefs” of the government are the laws of government. So, analogously, the government can force its employees to follow its “beliefs” with equal force.

“forcing her to issue licenses is akin to forcing a person who objects to war into the battlefield”

No clue. I am just explaining how you can have a score greater than 100 and be able to say there are some areas with flaws.

Old system: 50 +50 = 100

Problem is, the line between “sensible gun owner” and “crazed nut with a gun” can be crossed at any moment and people who start out as the former can over time be radicalized by certain ideologies (like “Trumpism” or Christian fundamentalism). The real question is whether the cost outwieghs the benefit.

If Jesus had an AR-15, he would be alive today.

If you want war with ISIS, and I think it is justified here (unlike some of our past wars that created this message or the current war being advocated for by conservatives with Iran), then start beating that war drum and let your hawks know that they are the real enemy.

Depends on your interpretation. The more fundy a person is, the more shit like this is acceptable. You can find verses in the bible to justify this shit too