What if the general audience at large really wants fawning and stratagems? Is there a no “fawning and stratagems” rule that I’m unaware of?

The last sentence was funny!

This a million time. Mwahaha, kill them all!

Mwahaha, anyone who says camping is bad usually has a bad case of “I can’t hold still-itis.” Which is a poliet way of saying you run around like a fucking jackass trying to rambo everything and get pissed when your tactics repeatedly fail.

Google, the ads you display can be terrible. They’re loud, flashy, annoying, and very possibly riddled with malware. They are the equivalent of STDs on the Internet. And you wonder why people use protection? It is your very own fault for allowing these ads to get so clickbaity and scammy in the first place. You are…

What Marmaladecreamcheesie said. Sleep paralysis is fubar.

Isn’t this Elite controller better than a Scuf? I mean, look at the hardware *and* software. THE CONTROL, MAN! THE CONTROL!

Microtransactions that do not apply to PvP aren’t the problem. It’s how people perceive these transactions and the mere idea that someone, somewhere, may have an advantage over them no matter how tiny.

You mean Destiny? With it’s pile of engrams that you have to get someone to turn them into possibly gold but end up getting blue? :p

I’m sorry, were you replying to someone else or did you develope a case of “can’t-fucking-read-itis?”

Nationalism can be both noble and evil, depending on the perspective of the individual.

The political spectrum’s x-axis is essentially the asshole axis. Just about anyone not dead center is an asshole and honestly, not a single soul has ever lived that is dead center. So we’re all assholes. And no, there is no tolerance for anyone, by anyone, for any group that doesn’t match our tribe perfectly. Usually…

Do you hear (read) yourself?

Wow, do you say things like Obama-phone, too?

You don’t really want to live in society, either. You seem to want to put people into place based on your definition of rules at the time. I bet you break the rules as much, if not more so, than anyone else. Because the rules only apply when you feel they should and if you break them, it’s because you know best.

You do know you can extrapolate the speed by measuring the distance between objects being passed on the side of the road, right? Not that I’m going to go through all the trouble to figure it out, but your comment is rank with stupid. “No speedometer, can’t figure out how fast something is! Science, how does it work?!”

I don’t think the driver wanted to kill them. But he definitely was indifferent to hurting them. He would have been ‘okay’ with killing them. Though we can assume a public apology will be made and the car driver will be ‘remorseful’ once the shit hits the fan and someone threatens to kill him and his family. Because,…

No no, there are thousands of assholes here, judging by the comment section.

Why spend all this time pointing out the biker was a jackass, period? If you’re not trying to justify the car driver’s actions, trying to prove some moral equivalence, or somehow lessen the driver’s responsibilty, then there is no need to point out that the motorcyclist is a jackass.

Jail time at the minimum.