The political thing for the prosecutor would be to charge them both with negligent homicide if he/she could get away with it and have the opportunity to at least convict one of them. They couldn’t do that, most likely because the evidence shows that Jemison acted within her rights to defend herself from a threat.…
MorbidRealities
morbidrealities
Again, my choice of rifles was to show that people die due to hands/feet/fists more than rifles (from the data available and logical assumptions). That being beaten to death, does happen in a direct rebuttal to another poster saying that shooting someone for being beaten was wrong. That and it’s not even taking into…
Yeah my mouth-foaming response is justified considering most of you fucking whack-jobs are calling for the woman to be released and willing to donate to a GoFundMe for her legal defense. A woman through her own direct and illegal actions caused the death of her unborn child. So many people have lost their moral…
“The ‘threat’ of death at the hands (literally) of a pregnant woman? Please. This is peak ridiculousness.”
“The realistic scenario is that the weapons are not classified, and you have no evidence to suggest the percentages at which the they should be.”
Fuck you, dude. Jones intentionally put her unborn baby in harms way and it resulted in it’s death. If Jemison had shot Jones without cause and that unborn child would have been miscarried, you’d all want Jemison to fry. Y’all are a bunch of fucking wack-a-moles. I’m Pro-Choice, but this shit going on in here, what…
“You know...you would have been better served if you never posted any actual statistics. Because those statistics don’t say what you want them to say.”
No, I’m not. The point is that people can and do die from being beaten to death. Add more for strangulation. Add more, a lot more in fact for great bodily harm. You’re pretending that a firearm is not a viable option to defend oneself against being beaten. You’re the one that’s being disingenuous.
I guess that would depend on the laws where you reside. Where I live, if you are in fear of great bodily harm or the well-being of family or even a stranger, it’s justified as long as you weren’t in the act of committing a felony yourself.
My POINT, which you clearly missed, was that you can easily be beaten to death with hands and fists. That’s not even taking into consideration the severe injuries that can be sustained the same way. A firearm can and should be utilized to prevent death or great bodily harm if you are legally allowed to have said…
“A Grand Jury can indict potato salad for having too much mayo, the fact that it failed even to indict Jemison, means that there was a clear and solid case of self defense and that Jemison was in legal possession of the firearm that was used. Both women are black and if it were a witch-hunt, they could have charged…
So if Jemison had shot Jones unprovoked and killed Jones “fetus”, but not Jones...you’d not want Jemison charged for manslaughter? That’s some really twisted logic you got going on there.
You have no idea if it was an appropriate escalation of violence. Jones was attacking and fighting another woman while she was 5 months pregnant. A Grand Jury, who can indict a fucking potato salad, couldn’t find a valid reason to indict Jemison (another black woman) for this. It was obvious that it was a clear case…
More people are killed by hands/feet and fists than by rifles every year. Deadly forced can and should be justified when the circumstances warrant it. A firearm is not meant to EVEN the playing field in self defense, it’s a force multiplier. When you feel like your life is in danger, you don’t want to even the playing…
So let me get this straight. The woman she attacked was found to have legally defended herself with a firearm. Alabama requires a permit to carry a concealed firearm (or open carry without a permit as long as you are legally allowed to do so), so I assume the woman that was attacked was carrying legally or she would…
Read the replies to the article. Yes, some women do in certain cases.
“That’s your bar, huh? That tells me a lot.”
No one’s defending that what he did was acceptable. People, me included, are saying that people are taking it as an egregious offense with malicious ill will and intent to cause harm. No one loses their shit when Instagram and Snapchat thots take pics and videos of themselves in public bathrooms. Naaaaawwww, lets hold…
Was the child naked? Was the child filmed with intent to exploit it in an egregious fashion? Do you know how many Instagram and Snapchat women film themselves in public bathrooms without an ounce of fucking outrage? You want me to sit here and believe that you’re over there clutching at pearls over this? That this…