That has nothing to do with what you said.

You’re joking right?  That would literally put every gaming streamer out of work.  

The fuck?  That’s some trippy shit.

She did and there was literally no proof that he abused her.  

I can’t tell if you’re trolling or what, but she had the entire amount for 14 months before he brought his lawsuit and didn’t pay them a dime during those 14 months. She paid a bit, her chump paid a it and even JD paid a bit and all that was before she had the amount in it’s entirety. In fact, EM and JD paid more of…

If it’s easy, please point me in that direction.  

LMFAO, wut?

You did, eh? The UK trial where the judge should have recused himself since his wife and AH are chummy? The one where the judge didn’t allow 4 hours of recorded admissions by AH of her committing DV and admitting she did indeed cut off JD’s finger because of the 2 party recording laws in the UK and Australia? That the…

Hahahahaha...no.  You were already schooled on this, but refuse to acknowledge the person that schooled you.  

But Johnny Depp does have to be a perfect victim, otherwise the default position has to be we support the woman, no matter how “imperfect”?

Actually they used 4 hours of recording with Heard admitting DV against Depp in the US case.  4 hours we didn’t see, but the Jury saw in it’s entirety.

Or that it’s come out that the judges wife and AH were chummy with one another and he should have recused himself.  Or that Heards audio admissions of DV weren’t allowed as evidence or that he took Heards word that she donated all the money and that proved she was a good person etc.  That judgement is in the process…

If even a single case proven that he laid a hand on her in anger would have proven DV and he would have lost. As it was, there wasn’t a single shred of evidence that he so much as touched her in anger. The parts where he directly appeared to verbally abuse her were trash, because nothing was presented by Heards team…

“It was absolutely that many of them enjoyed a traditionally attractive woman being taking down a peg.”

That lady was burned horribly.  Bad take

The way Probable Cause is used now a slap to the face to the 4th Amendement. Probable Cause is so convoluted and loose that they can call it probable cause to search your vehicle if you’re “acting nervous” when in reality a lot of people are nervous around cops.

Speaking as a Constitutional Republican (if I can even be called that), I am definately against rapid tests and fully against warrantless searches which are a violation of the 4th. Rapid tests have a 30% (low estimate) false positive rate. Dogs, even the best ones, report false positives over 50% of the time because…

Yes, lets sexualize these young women by making it obvious you are trying to cover up their chests. As for making those ladies unzip their jackets to prove to the administrators that they weren’t wearing anything inappropriate underneath...that would have been an ass beating. Tell my daughter to do something like that…

Yup. I’m a white dude that started smoking menthols instead of normals in the ARMY so people would stop bumming them from me in the field. Now I smoke them because I prefer them.

Hope? My own mental and emotional well-being?