If we were to go the route of grammatical economy, ‘a NASCAR Toyota Supra’ would be sufficient.

I’m actually tempted to take that approach with baseballs and basketballs, calling them MLBs and NBAs.

The sport has been around for 60 years now. The terms are well established.

This is a post by someone whose job is to write articles, and thus have pretty good grammar.

This is also probably my biggest grammatical pet peeve. It’s akin to people who hate hearing the word ‘moist’.

A Toyota Supra NASCAR

Also, the 200 when had with the Pentastar V6 was exceptional (particularly in AWD form) but it was never given a chance. Granted, that’s Chrysler brand, which also offers the Pacifica.

Alfas, but more reliable... Which isn’t a high bar, granted.

I lost Domino’s probably 10 years ago when they first changed to the very garlic-y crust. My chain of choice is Pizza Hut, but only their pan pizza. Usually I prefer thin crust.

The ML (from my knowledge) was scratch built/designed after a joint-development project with Mitsubishi fell through. (It was originally to be Pajero based)

If the recently replaced generation of Mazda 6 had more power, than I might have bought one of them rather than my 300. They're beautiful cars.

Yikes!

If I made any more money than I do, I would get better pizza than occasional LC... Or if I lived in a place with better cheap pizza.

The Durango and GC ARE actually the same vehicle underneath.

You did claim that it started with the same platform as the LX cars.

A platform in the current sense, is suspension and suspension geometry.

In order to share those, items would need to be shared or similar. They are not.

88K on my 300. Admittedly, I have 2 active issues:

1- Bluetooth stopped working. it’s a $200-$250 module that I can’t be arsed to buy and swap.

2- Blind Spot sensors were dead before I bought it. apparently water can get into them and kill them. $800/piece and I don’t care to replace them.

The only other issues:

-The…

The Dart needed to abandon the 2.slow, add the 9 speed to the 2.4 after they figured it out, and add a goddamn SRT to make it somewhat desirable.

...and keep the 1.4 because while the Dart existed, that was the best motor if you could drive stick (provided you didn’t break it).

As the owner of a black 300 with factory blue pinstripes on it that somehow make something that should blend in competently, stick out like a sore thumb... I appreciate the non-normal cars as long as they stay afloat.

Also, let’s be honest. The cars they’re making are cash cows DESPITE complaints about things like age…

Used in rally, road course, and off-roading for glare reasons to be more specific.

LC’s marketing campaign even is just that it’s HOT, and it’s READY.

That’s it. not flavor, just 2 criteria.

As someone with a WK2 (MY14) and LX (MY12) in their driveway, I4gotMykey is making a huge stretch, as the only parts shared between them are also shared with either a RAM or a Dart.

Definitely.

The ‘better looking’ is very subjective.

The Camaro is butt-ugly.

The Mustang, however, I can’t argue with on looks. It and the Challenger are almost equally attractive, but in different ways, much like how an Aston and a Lamborghini could be equally attractive.