I mean, that I can agree with. You can believe that Biden is ultimately the less harmful candidate without refusing to acknowledge his flaws or defending tangential character assassination of rape victims.

Man, you can tell a lot of people here have never been poor. 

She wasn't killed by a drunk driver. She failed to yield the right of way.

Hiding your car from repo isn’t grifting. Failing to pay your rent isn’t grifting. Being poor isn’t grifting. Being a victim of domestic violence who is trying to get away from it isn’t grifting.  Writing positive articles about Putin isn’t even grifting.

How good a job did the Dems do vetting Clinton? You think things don’t slip through? Especially when their concern was finding the most conservative racist dem to appeal to the southern racists. Because face it, that’s why Joe Biden was chosen as Obama’s running mate.

I’m not aware of any stutter causing one to be racist or lie about easily proven statements, but here we are.

Completely disagree. As in, I think almost all outlets are going out of their way to smear her and bending over backwards to find reason why we should not believe her.

Also disagree, in that I think many, many signs point to her telling the truth.

The hypocrisy of those not believing Reade is shameful.

I mean, Monica Lewinsky wasn’t “Monica Lewinsky” at the time. In the 90's she was a manipulative homewrecking slut, until much later when people were like “Oh, I guess that was probably a smear...”

Biden has a history of lying for personal gain so... *shrug*

For years he said that she and his daughter were killed by a drunk driver. There's no evidence that the other driver had been drinking, but his wife probably failed to yield the right of way. He eventually issued an apology to the driver and recanted, but then went back to saying he was drunk a couple years later.

And so many of the people in these comments are like “See! I knew she was dishonest!” like, even the worst of these landlord stories just indicate that she was broke, not dishonest. Just say you hate poor people and go.

I think the article is pointing out that financial difficulty does not mean that she lied about being raped. It’s not related.

Her testimony that it happened is evidence. Also, multiple people have corroborated her story. There is absolutely no evidence that “the alleged incident couldn’t have or didn’t take place” (????).

Exactly!  So Joe Biden is innocent.

Not only are all these things immaterial to Reade’s allegations, nobody ever seems to frame Biden’s honesty and integrity around say, his well noted plagiarism, or repeated lies about any number of things he's told just in this campaign alone (Mandela, pinning the medal into the soldier, etc).

The way that Bill Clinton’s accusers, especially Paula Jones and Juanita Broadrick were treated by a lot of Democrats and liberals, as well as the press, was an absolute fucking disgrace. But that was decades ago, a different time, etc., and I honestly thought after Kavanaugh we’d moved on from that sort of attitude…

You’re right. She still called a 9 yo cocky on her massive platform. So... why? Why do that?

Yes, she will call you a cunt like she did Quvenzhane Wallis who was 9 years old, or tell you to “take a dirt nap” like she did to Courtney Stodden, a minor victim of sex abuse. I wanted to like Tiegen too but I don't think she's a good person. 

The original DINO

(like that she “changed her story,” when she really didn’t)