montgirl
montgirl
montgirl

Let me be clear - I don’t think any politician, female or male, should have to turn over transcripts of private speeches given while they were not a candidate. So, yes, I think she should get a pass. I think it is a violation of privacy and a person’s right to work to require it. She had every right to take any amount

Totally normal. I did the same thing when my mom died.

This website is crap. It told me that my poodle was an English Setter. They don’t even look close.

Lol. It should be “investigated.” By who? Do you think she did something criminal? I have no doubt that she said something to GS that is counter to what she is saying now. I also have no doubt that you could point to a similar instance for every male politician who has ever run for president.

Well, he could attack the republican candidates. Just a thought. Good point about Trump. I guess you don’t really need his private speeches to show how outrageous he is.

I’m not so certain she is the frontrunner at this point. And as for the other frontrunners, I see nothing regarding people asking for transcripts of their private speeches. I wonder what Trump has said in private speeches?

Yes, Romney was hurt. That’s the point. Any politician who has to give up private speeches is going to be hurt by the content. That’s the point. Why should she be the only one to give up her speeches? And there is no possible way she is the only one who has given a speech to a group that has something to do with her

And how many millions of dollars have the Bushes made for speeches? How many millions have members of the Kennedy family made? It’s a ridiculous double standard to apply it simply to her. And if you are going to apply it, then you need to be clear exactly when it’s applicable. Are you saying that even though she was

No she shouldn’t have to release them. Even if you want to give the whole “candidates should be transparent argument”, she wasn’t a candidate in October of 2013. She was a woman giving a private speech for money. Is she supposed to release every other transcript of every speech she gave before announcing her candidacy

When is she supposed to be transparent though? She wasn’t a candidate when she gave this speech. She was just someone getting paid to give a speech. Should she have to release all of her private speeches ever because she announced her candidacy in 2015? Where does the privacy line get drawn?

Really? That’s total bullshit. Do you not remember when Romney was secretly recorded giving a speech to a bunch of rich donors about the 1%? It totally contradicted his platform. We just happened to get a recording of it because one of the staff at the event recorded it on his phone. That shit happens all the time.

Why? When has a man ever been pressured to release private speeches when running for president?

Yeah, you’re an idiot. This does not even come close to meeting the legal elements for murder.

Well, I’m not sure that I can share your last sentiment about the grandfather. I have no doubt he feels awful. Not that it forgives him for having a loaded gun lying around anywhere in the house, but I also don’t think he deserves a dead grandchild. I have no doubt this man grew up in the heart of the NRA gun culture

Yeah, the point is not that people are “rude.” Because obviously both sides are going to have really rude supporters. The point is that Hillary, as a woman, gets attacked because of her sex. And that does not mean that every Bernie supporter is a Bernibro or that everyone who does not support her is anti-feminist. But

But is that what this article is insinuating? I thought it was just noting that there are supporters of Bernie, and other men, who attack Hillary because she is a woman. Which is true. But also does not mean that just because you support Bernie you are one of those people or betraying your sex. I mean, can’t we

Holy shit someone changed their mind. Quick get out the pitchforks. How dare she actually have ideas that progress as she gets more experience.

Yeah, but it kind of makes sense. Not because Hillary is so great, but because she is someone who is willing to get in the mud with congress. Bernie will not compromise. He has lofty ideals and a head in the clouds. And in congress, he did not have to compromise. He could easily vote against the stuff he didn’t like,

Well, both men and women could sign up for WWII as well, but obviously they had very different positions (nurses vs. soldiers, for example). So I don’t know. Maybe with the population of the United States and the fact that women can basically do anything men can do in the armed forces, you would not need a draft.

I’m confused. Are you upset because your family voluntarily signs up for the military and then people get killed? I mean, that’s part of signing up for the military - the acceptance of harm. Why does your family keep doing it if it pisses you off and people keep dying? Or are you upset because you believe your family