monstachruck
monstachruck
monstachruck

I haven’t watched the show or played the game- everything I know about it has been through cultural osmosis and reading wikipedia (I give no shits about spoilers), but honestly making the young protagonist a sociopath sounds way more compelling and interesting than the existing story from the game.

I wanted to like this but there were just a bunch of little things that kinda turned me off- sloppy writing, kind of a lame aesthetic, and somewhat janky controls. Also I must be the only one that didn’t really dig the music, just didn’t stand out. Nothing really over-the-top in terms of criticism, just was not for me.

Could you even tell that person was a protestor? Even in some of the clearer pics and videos I can’t read the writing on her body. They just seemed like an attention-seeking vouyer.

As opposed to characters on a show, you dingus

Is it wierd that I really don’t like the whole “gritty, grey” Star Wars? For me, space wizards and lasers swords is what made Star Wars better than a lot of other boilerplate sci-fi. With Last Jedi, Andor, and Rogue One, it feels like kind of dark fan fiction that reduces Star Wars to just typical political sci-fi to

Akira is literally one of the only good anime ever made imo. I’ve never been able to enjoy the medium more than with these older feature-length anime. Series and everything post 2000 is trash to me.

Maybe my sense of taste is 100% inverted, but I actually liked Iron Man 2 a lot more than 3?

I dunno, I just thought it was cooler all around, and I actually like Mickey Rourke as a mad Russian. Sam Rockwell was a fun villain as well; I think the Iron Man story is at its best when it’s skewering the

His face looks like her last name.

This article is like a complaint from a boomer star wars fan obsessed with canon.

Shyamalan just wishes he was Neil Breen.

I’m guessing it turned out like a 2 hour CW show, quality-wise. I know some folks are fans of those, but if what I’m speculating is true, I don’t blame them for shelving.

I usually stan for Kotaku writers for having pretty nuanced viewpoints, but this is probably the worst, most inaccurate and inarticulate review I’ve read in a long time. I get that EA isn’t a company we should be rooting for, but what a terrible take.

What?

Funniest shit I’ve ever seen.

The big difference is that Neil Breen has a soul. A wierd alien clone soul, but a soul none-the-less

Shit I’d create a twitter account just so I could delete it for Disney money

It’s way less deep than that.

Yup, this is the crux of the whole issue. They want to paint LGBTQA existence as an “agenda” that targets children, and they ignorantly equate non-binary with sexual deviance which may include pedophilia. That’s what it’s really all about- they want to blame the gays for all their molested children, and not the

What exactly is cringe? I always associated it with Tim & Eric-type stuff, which I love, but apparently it also applies to like overly-cute/childish stuff, which isn’t so much cringe as just annoying I think? Maybe I’m just old.

I think the writer was trying to draw more attention to Pentiment by mentioning it was created by the same director as FoNV. It’s not that weird if you know how to read in context.