I hate all of this so much.  

Skinny is back, everyone.  Take all that cement out of your behind and the silicone out of your boobs and get on the Ozempy train.

There are red states whose Republican controlled legislatures would attempt to pass the Comstock Act today.

Yep. I call bullshit on this. While her overall point is sound, she’s is saying that when she was a bit bigger she was super unhealthy (drinking etc.) which means her current look is her version of healthy. Um. She’s emaciated. She looks thinner and more emaciated than I’ve ever seen her. And she’s looked at by…

I agree everyone is different, everyone’s story is different...and maybe she’s perfectly fine.......but there are times, when it comes to certain afflictions, that there is a common thread.

She was a judge like two or three seasons ago. She did fine—it's clear she's way into the weeds on the technical aspects of singing and voice.

Coming from an old fart in her forties, this shit is tedious. Yes, they all starve themselves. The are generally attractive people who have plastic surgeons, stylists, estheticians, trainers, and chefs. And they also starve themselves. It’s not healthy, but they are going to keep doing it and claim that they aren’t. La…

Maybe I’m just an anonymous nobody gossiping, but this is Red Flag-y.

thank you! i was looking for a comment the justification that her “old” look was when she was “unhealthy” like its a justification for how she is now. 

Oh, I agree with you. But as we’ve seen the “originalists” like to cherry-pick. What would’ve seemed like an obvious slam-dunk even ten years ago is no longer so.

I’m not invested in this at all, and agree that we should all mind our fucking business when it comes to other people’s health, but I do want to point out that what she said is EXACTLY what people with an ED say when someone voices concern about them.

And Congress should get offa their collective asses and protect abortion rights, too - esp. since a large majority of Americans support that in some fashion.

Well, Congress should change it. But I’d disagree with any SCOTUS ruling that upheld it, because as the article says, “the law hasn’t been considered constitutional or enforceable for decades.”

I can already guess the Supreme Court’s response in upholding it then, they’ll pass the buck to Congress saying if they don’t like the law - change it.

More proof that CEO isn’t a necessary job in a corporation.

Gizmodo thanks you for the engagement with your clicks and comments.

Is he actively trying to tank the company so he can claim it as a loss on his taxes or what? 

Tackling real problems can be hard and doesn’t get his fans showering him in adulation, so why do that? So the HATERS can offer him moderate praise? So those suffering from his decisions suffer a little less? LOOK TITS!

  You're mistaking outrage for contempt.

This is how the CEO of 3 large companies and father of 10 decides to spend his time.